You should really research things like, petrified trees exist but the data the provide is limited, best we get is like 9000 years and only in temperate climates (which were always that way). It’s some data but it’s not conclusive. ICE cores are better but they are only available in limited areas.

Are you really this stupid?

No measurements, it’s common sense not to pollute, it’s more efficient too. It’s only more expensive since that is how it’s setup — we incentivize stupid waste of resources. I always point to a simple logical argument. There are 1000’s of antique shops and 100’s of thousands of collectors. All are stacked to gills…

Actually I was thinking more of the politicians who take the bribes to set the laws ... the lawyers/lobbyists that bribe them, the bureaucrats that regulate/don’t regulate them, their bribes too. The folks who want to tax one part or another of it, the industry of audits, the non-value added stuff that tracks one side…

And that’s the primary problem with global warming anthropogenic global warming climate change — it was politicized from day one. For example, Article 2 of the IPCC document ‘Principles Governing IPCC Work’ states “The role of the IPCC is to assess on a comprehensive, objective, open and transparent basis the…

Yes it has. The World Bank does half of its business spreading fear and doom and gloom, what are you talking about?

Yep, they’re called mathematical models and theoretical extrapolations from limited data. And so far, most of them have been proven to be incorrect.

Too much work. I’ve got a great plan to wrangle comets to the Earth’s surface to bring temperatures down.

Statistically that’s utterly meaningless in terms of global temperature change, considering recorded history constitutes about 0.00000000001% of the climate history of the planet. The earth is 4.5 BILLION years old and you’re looking at, what, 150 Septembers? The variance in measurement technique alone over 150 years…

Ain’t no 50k old trees....Soil & Ice samples but those aren’t real solid, but those are localized ...

“Discoveries.” Pfft. More like “scams.”

Looking forward to a record warm winter. Global warming can have benefits too!

Perfect example of two wrongs don’t make a right.

So passing two cars at a very high rate of speed in a double yellow isn’t being a douchebag?

“Who is he endangering other than himself?”

Obey the god damned rules of the road and quit excusing dangerous god damned behavior.

I’m a rider and couldn't agree with you more. Timsee sounds like an asshole rider.

20mph under isn’t illegal in general. Whatever the law says, the law says. I know that the minimum legal speed on a freeway is 40mph, which is at least 25 under the maximum.

a) You are right. There are some places where a motorcycle could overtake with no risk for anyone and a car couldn’t. But laws are meant for vehicles without dinstinction between 2, 4 or 18 wheels; and if you are using that road, you should obey them. My opinion as a rider when I get stuck behind a slow vehicle: pull…

Looks to me like a case of asshole (swerving into them) on asshole (speeding recklessly, passing in a no passing zone, no safety clothing) crime.