slowtraincoming
slowtraincoming
slowtraincoming

I like this nickname. Until now, I’ve used Emmy Nominee, but though it implies that he lost, it still sounds too flattering.

I’m so relieved to know Alec Baldwin has learned an insult to hurl besides homophobic epithets. For years, it seemed f— was all he could come up with.

Should we all weigh in on Perez’s decision to reproduce now? Since he thinks whether others do is his business?

I have 48 cousins. I’m not exaggerating—I could name every one. I’m close with 80% of them. I also live 600 miles from the majority of them, have a family of my own, and occasionally would like to do something that interests me in the little free time I have. Or should I spend every waking moment calling each family

I think he’s grown up a lot and shed a lot of his misogyny in recent years, especially since getting sober. Or am I misinformed?

Yeah, the grossest thing about this guy is his weight...

There’s definitely another way to view those comments, and I see what you’re getting at. But some seemed to say (or explicitly said), “look at what she sends down the runway!”(insert photo of dress with body showing). And to that I would say, what’s that got to do with the price of milk? That Donna provides the

Guys, responding with images of Donna’s designs that supposedly point to her hypocrisy isn’t the answer here. It still suggests that a viewer is the arbiter of what’s too revealing (otherwise, how did you decide what designs to post) rather than the woman who owns the body she’s revealing. Don’t argue with DK on her

This. Without exception, if you ask a limo driver, a bouncer, etc. (basically a “little person” who interacts with the jet set) who the most horrid celeb they’ve ever dealt with is, they say Donna Karan.

So yes, 13 kids.

Dave Grohl always grates. He’s rarely wrong, per se, but is always deeply lacking in perspective, as your comment expertly points out.

I sincerely hope someone gave him a Pirin tablet afterwards.

If it helps, I was approved and starred back when that was a thing, and was a frequent commenter. One of the things I commented on was how Jez needed to be better, especially when writers were problematic. I am now permagray.

I keep looking at this and just being totally fucking baffled. Like, giving you the benefit of the doubt, Dove, even with a fucking microscope I can’t find another meaning to this ad. What exactly do they claim they were they trying to get at, if not exactly the tropes posted?

I 100000000% agree with this. But I also think there’s a difference between, “I hope you don’t mean me (because my ego couldn’t take it!)” and “I hope you don’t mean me because I’ve put a lot of effort into introspection and listening to women before I comment, but if I’ve still blown it, I’m willing to hear that and

Well summarized. I think the other thing that came up was more general: a lot of women-identifying folks here are confused, bothered, and otherwise nonplused at feeling like male-identifying commenters are dominating conversations (i.e. threads) about our issues on a women’s site. The feeling is, welcome fellas. We’re

As I said to a friend in college who marveled at my ability to land sex bombs of all genders, “look: I’m not that pretty, and I’m kinda fat, but I’ve got mad game.” You think Bill Clinton is actually that good looking? Nah. But everyone I know who’s ever met him says you’ve never been in a room with anyone more

To a discussion of how our puritanical notions about sex are harmful to children, and how sex positivity encourages them instead to experience life as their full, authentic selves? 😉

Whaaaaaaa? For the sake of argument, let’s say she’s a slut, and let’s say being a slut is bad. Even that being the case, what in the name of Amber Rose could that have to do with a terrorist attack?! I didn’t follow the coverage closely enough, clearly; I had no idea she got a hard time. Jesus. What the ever-loving

I thought the writer suggesting anyone could be “objectively” beautiful was laughable, as this entire thread has made clear.