Yeah, I gave Game Grumps a try once. It's like Let's Play videos even though they refuse to call them Let's Plays even though they kind of actually are Let's Plays.

It's like dude... if you're gonna complaining about tutorials, at least show that you have the skill and understanding to play without them.

"Well it has NERF in the name, guys, that has to do with video games. Right?"

Ummmm he's been updating like twice a week pretty regularly; I don't know what bizarro universe you live in.

I think the most effective form of missiles (or automated mines like that, which would be super effective) would be tick-based: burrow into the hull a little and then detonate. Even in any form of combat, that kind of missile would be really effective against buildings or heavily armored units.

Well a concussive blast would do more damage to a ship's hull. I've thought about it before, and yeah if a bomb were to blow up in space it would probably be a few small bits blown away super quick, leaving behind a patch of high energy. This would actually last a little longer than a normal explosion, since for…

My inner-space-warfare paper states that mines are only effective in space combat when place around specific objects, or in large clouds. Explosion-based weaponry aren't that useful in space because there's no medium for a shock-wave to be created. The only use an explosive would have in space would to be embedded or…

...holy crap when will people realize that those glasses and mustaches look RETARDED. I don't CARE if it's ironic, irony justifies nothing! I could take a poop on a camera lens, and use that as a cover "ironically" and people will still find it gross.

"overtake" isn't the same as "taking over". I read the article, and what they mean by "overtake" is that social gaming will make more money. By "taking over", it means to actually TAKE OVER. Unless the article was about how Zynga was buying out Microsoft's gaming branch, nothing of my point was destroyed.

"....you hear that these new-fangled social and mobile games are taking over..." I'm sorry... what? This is a statement Kotaku needs to actually think about before throwing around for teh free clikz. Social/Mobile gaming isn't "taking over", and it never will. The people who started with non-social/mobile gaming are…

TRON 2.0 has an AMAZING story. I remember my first play-through; at first I was perplexed, but when I got further I REALLY got into it. I wish they hadn't de-canonized it, cause it still does fit with Legacy :/

Sooooo NOT because of the douche-bag cover-guy that is posted in every ad, video, and article about the game...

So then who's Peach and why is she ruling over that land?

I agree; both from Cracked and other places. Can't we just get back to the real issue; a demonic turtle dragon with a fetish for human princesses, world domination, and being actually evil? Besides, goombas are supposed to be spineless traitors.

There's like five of them. Get over it.

Well, it's not just the haters that are causing the flame wars; it's the super-defensive butt-hurt ultra-fanboys (which, let's be frank, makes up for a large percentage of the fanbase) that can't handle any heat and blow up at the slightest comment. Some of the haters only do it for the reaction, and boy do they get…

Economic isolation?

What about a game about the war between the Humans and the Turians? What about the Rachni wars? What about when the Geth were first created and rebelled? There are actually quite a few good stories in Mass Effect's backstory...

Yeah... I was confused too. My thoughts were "What? I didn't know Nintendo was in the crapper during the GC era..."

A man can only stand so much, aawells. A man can only stand so much.