To be perfectly honest, I respect where you're coming from. I can tell you Christianity wasn't formed in the Crusades, and actually grew to being way back in the Roman Empire. They didn't get big from crusades or battles; just from an oppressive government and house-churches. But anyways, that's besides the point.

I'm not calling you a douche or anything, and I really do appreciate the fact that you don't judge people for something like that.

Is it absolutely true that nothing can be proven to be absolutely true? Logically, nothing else works, and there's no middle ground in this subject. Truth cannot be relative because then what makes anything true in this world is restricted to our minds, which is obviously false because of all that goes on in the…

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm not sure females are supposed to have crotch-bulges...

No Enslaved: Odyssey to the West?! BLASPHEMY!! BLLAAASPHEEEMMYYYY

The big side-panel-thing of a basic overview is something the reviews here really needed. No sarcasm.

If the matter floating through the universe obeys the physical laws, what put those laws into place? Why are they there? Why are they consistent and applicable to everything (absolutely true)?

I am not arguing that morals or math are some sort of sub-atomic particle, or some sort of all-present force in the universe. But you seem to have misinterpreted the message I was attempting to get across.

Genetic adaptation is not the same as Macro-Evolution. A gold fish may be able to adjust its size to whatever body of fluid it resides in, and it may be able to change whether it lives in salt water or fresh water if it was steadily introduced to either; but that study is not trying to see how animal A became animal…

I have replied below to a lot of stuff, but let me state a small reply to this:

First, let me say that my college internet is crap, and that the Disney website made me laugh too. I was going to reply before to your statements, but I was unable to due to the internet both being down, and the website not letting me post. But whatever, I can see now this post answers those anyways.

For what I have said above, science can't explain; and to be perfectly honest I won't be surprised at all if they never do. But I will say that Christianity does account for those immaterial factors of our universe with a God who created everything in order and guides everything. Science will not find a fundamental…

I SHALL NEVER FORGIVE CAPCOM FOR THAT! They get such amazing IPs like that and Viewtiful Joe and just THROW IT ALL AWAY.

You're right on the Quantum stuff. Nobody understands that crap.

Naturalism states that all there is to this world is the physical and the tangible, correct? But what I am saying is that this view-point fails to explain several fundamental portions of our universe that are intangible; such as logic, math, or even the laws of physics themselves.

Just follow along with what I'm saying to RB26Skyline, cause it's pretty much the same and it saves space to not paste it doubly.

I would go onto a friendly debate (trust me, I'm not the insulting type), but my argument doesn't go into that territory, so I would just end up being out of context. If you want to hear it anyways I'm all up for it. Just so you know, it doesn't argue against evolution but naturalism (worldview of nature being all…

The proof of creation is not in physical evidence, but within non-physical attributes of this world. Naturalism is a very poor worldview for explaining things and cannot stand on itself.

YES! THANK YOU! YES!!

...define "popular" movement...