I really hate the argument "DUDE JUST DON'T DO THE SIDE-QUESTS". If I'm only going to play 20 hours of an 80+ hour game, then why did I spend 60$ on a game I'm not going to completely play? Or in a different image, why would I buy an entire pie only to eat a quarter (or less) of it, and then throw it away?

Curse you Capcom! You have robbed me off Megaman Legends 3 AND I WILL NEVER FORGIVE YOU FOR THAT!

Hey, I'm just judging from what I've seen of the trailer, the ESRB, and from what I've heard of a certain stage. So yeah, I was probably bound to be wrong. I'll look more into it.

Currently looking for mods that censor the more sexual-oriented stuff. Make fun of me if you want, I just draw the line when a game gets borderline pornographic.

The amount of PETA hate here has brought a joyful tear to my eye. I feel like wearing animal fur just to celebrate!

Part of me still wants to play the Duke, just to see for myself how bad it is. I'm a big fan of "So Bad It's Good", and this is something I want to see for myself. However, it would have to have a censorship mod. I draw the lines at the sexual references at that degree.

[forums.cncnz.com]

A CnC game is unlikely. The studio in question has answered questions for CnC news site "CNC-NZ". They've said they ARE working another Command and Conquer, but any news on it won't be released for like a year. Speculated release date for the game is 2013.

Metal Mario is my all time favorite. But it seems after Smash Bros. that the Metal Cap made a persona of its own, and is more of a villain than anything...

...So you're complaining about the items themselves, and not what they do...

- Have it more in-depth for the interactions with the side characters, even the towns people.

Cannon fodder doesn't need to be mindless cannon fodder. It's all in the amount of effort and AI the developers put into designing the enemy. I think a cool option would be more of a Batman option: giving you the ability to stop an enemy without killing them, but still present the option of killing them. But if they…

Now THAT'S a baggy rack I can get behind!

My personal policy: Look at NEW games objectively, and look at remakes SUBJECTIVELY. I did this with Ocarina of Time. I didn't look at it like a new game, I looked at it like Ocarina of Time but with BETTAR GRAPHICZ.

I've always though Hugh Jackman would make an AWESOME Snake.

I refuse. As long as Homestuck makes Flash-Animated segments that boast a LOT of story contribution, I will not join the band-wagon.

I agree. According to Meta-Critic, Ocarina of Time sits atop the throne of reviewed games (99/100). From a critic's stand-point, Skyward Sword hasn't surpassed it. But, I won't say if it's better or not until I play it. Who knows, maybe it will be...

And nobody seems to get that the literary focus, for once, isn't the protagonist. Just because one game has its focus on the protagonist, doesn't mean Zelda has to.

I think a lot of people miss the point of Zelda games in terms of protagonists. I've never played a Zelda game expecting them to flesh out who I'm playing as, I always expect the game to flesh out the surrounding world, and those in it. The focus isn't Link, it's what's around Link. Call this BS if you want, but I…