Hack-Fortress 2.

If I beat a game in 3-5 hours, I would feel jipped. But no, the thing is my ideal range is 20-40 hours (40 is pushing it, unless the game is THAT fun). But I'm not going to buy a game that boasts 80 hours of content if you want to beat it 100% (except the idea of 100% is slowly being expelled from games) if I only…

I like my games like my movies. There's a point where it can be too short to enjoy, and a point where it's too long to enjoy. And then there's the perfect in-between length that gives me maximum fun for my buck.

I actually... don't want this game. It's not because I think it looks poorly made (this game will probably be a staple in the industry), and not because of my preference of genre. It's because I actually look at this and it looks... TOO long for me. I understand getting your 60$ worth of a game, believe me I've been…

One reason I avoid most games based off of real wars. Nobody ever stops to think that friends, family members, and spouses died in these wars, and I think some respect is lost towards these events.

I... I don't know if I should laugh, or cry.

Shouldn't it be called "Mama Luigi's"?

I see a lot of potential with this. Say, an RTS game where the map and build-orders are on the tablet, and the gameplay is all up top! Or say a Metroid Prime game where you scan with the tablet!

Wow guys, lay off the puns. Uranus has always been at the butt of the jokes and deserves a break!

The memory mention was not irrelevant. Memories are chemical reactions in the brain, everyone agrees on this. How chemicals reacts to each other does in fact fall under universal laws of physics (I wasn't just referring to high school physics).

Well, if you made a book with these, I can see many possibilities for the kinds of books that can be written. One possibility is MSPA released in book-format with gifs and animations remaining in the book.

So lemme get this straight, the point you're standing on is this:

And if you want me to explain the point he is making on "Without God, you can prove nothing", answer me this:

Refuted? Aside from the talk of morals you gave no counter argument, you only cast down the argument as BS without reason. You gave no counter-argument to support yourself. You've fallen for the most common atheist fallacy in an argument, with which is to instantly cast aside the argument as false without giving any…

That seems like a real general thing to change. I mean, you could say this towards all games that don't radically change after ever sequel. I could say Halo doesn't change past its "Go here and shoot this, go there and defend this" formula. I don't think Nintendo's refusing to change as this is pretty much the core…

Then perhaps you need to see that physical evidence is not the only type.

...change how? If you're referring to graphics, that's not that big of a deal.

Who says they're idiots? What I was referring to was the naturalist approach of "theory until undeniable evidence proves it".

Dude, don't bring a BS-filled debate here. You and I both know neither side is fully proven by societal standards and nobody's going to convince anyone.

DO WANT. Althought I already have the Ocarina of Time two-parter and A Link to the Past! Oh well, I guess I can just gift those.