No, I seriously don’t know. I see your point, I also see the point that she’s probably a regular person with a regular person’s financial resources which makes it much more difficult for her to protect herself when her name is known. But, I also don’t think people should be able to drag the rich into court while…

That social worker in Florida was lying on the ground with his hands up keeping still and they still shot him (ok not dead, but in hospitalized as a result). When asked why he pulled the trigger, the cop in question is reported to have said “I don’t know”.

“clutch your pearls, motherfucker” should really be a bumper sticker.

No I disagree. That Jez article was stupid meaningless carping that accomplished nothing and missed the point. The Seahawks locker room has clearly been talking about this extensively and in depth and their approach is both more thoughtful and more useful than anything Jez had to say on the subject.

Here we go. Kill the women. Because that would be something new and different, wouldn’t it? Women never get killed normally. Oh no, women are completely safe in this world, it would so stinking novel for a woman to get killed.

upon further review, I think this “man i love deadspin” thing might be a troll.

I want to take the side of the players and argue with you. They are not protesting the entire way of life of this country, they are protesting the bias they perceive on the part of police to engage in increased levels of violence and deadly force more quickly when dealing with people of color, and specifically with…

There’s still the other shit. There’s just the new shit to go with the old shit. More shit choices are better in a free market, aren’t they? You don’t have to click on the shit that annoys you.

How is this race baiting? It’s a simple report that the Seahawks hope that some white players will join the protest for good and valid reasons. How is that race baiting? Do you know what race baiting means?

Coconut cream. Otherwise spot on.

No.

But...but that’s what we’re talking about, right? I mean, that’s what this article is about in part, is the judge ruling that she must use her name in the trial.

WHY THE HELL SHOULD SHE??

This is what I do not understand. Why is it ok for otherwise reasonable appearing people (not the obvious Trumpers) to have no problem at all with this double standard? I know we all know why, but...but I just wanted to say it out loud, I guess.

Proof positive they don’t, I guess.

So, her name won’t be out there if she’s required to use it at trial?

It’s an avoidable issue. The simple issues Kaepernick raised a few weeks ago, as well as issues about screening personality types, as well as LONG known issues about pay, support, and staffing levels are all well known. They just haven’t been addressed any more than they have been for fire fighters and EMTs.

Yes. I doubt she has millions of dollars like Rose does to protect herself from hecklers and nut cases.

This is a happy thought, but they are a far cry from having to write an essay about why you shouldn’t be fined $1,000.00. I imagine this guy makes a thousand bucks when he sneezes, so it would take a bit more than that to actually stop him making the accusers life miserable.

But I thought we were, like, totally sure that Chip is racist and insane. How is this possible?