I haven’t denounced Kavanaugh’s accuser and will gladly contribute $100 to the non profit of your choosing if you can point to any comment where I have.

Probably the first, definitely not the second, probably the third.

If anyone pulled a camera phone on my while I was doing my job, I would rip it from their hands and shove it straight up his or her ass.

Goddamn you’re an idiot.  

This lady sounds like she would have been a wet blanket on that wild Sundance trip.

Valid is probably a more accurate word.

You actually created an account for the sole purpose on calling me out and that’s the best you could do?

Wow. You’re a loser.

You are incorrect.  As the DOJ stated: “the purpose of a background investigation is to determine whether the nominee could pose a risk to the national security of the United States. The allegation does not involve any potential federal crime. The FBI’s role in such matters is to provide information for the use of the…

That generations of the Bush family will continue to be a fixture on the political scene?

Do you always slur people who hold different views than you? I imagine you were thrilled when Brown decided to censor Lisa Littman’s study because it didn’t support their ideology. By the way, the SPLC it’s credibility a while ago and using them to support your slanderous statement is disingenuous and lazy.

That meme has been thoroughly debunked. Please go step in front of a bus.

but SO FAR he hasn’t put America into two wars, spent trillions, oversaw the deaths of thousands of American soldiers and god knows how many civilians in the invaded countries, etc.

but it is yours and it is real.

I enjoyed tearing apart your comment.

And you’re still not dealing with the statistics.

I thought you were done with me.  Why are you still here?

you’re just using an appeal to logic

Brett Kavanaugh must be guilty because he’s a proven liar.

Bret Kavanaugh must be guilty because I was sexually assaulted in Junior High is not a valid argument.

Thank you - it’s nice to try to take down others’ arguments by saying, “Well, can you PROVE that?” rather than providing evidence to the contrary.