What do you mean by "protect each party involved"?
slapd
slapd
if duke did everything to the T in regards to title IX, there would be a paper trail in their student conduct office which the article suggests. This would technically fulfill the title IX requirement right?
that grey area being, duke not doing anything about for 10 months after interviewing the victims.
or its been substantiated enough to kick him off the TEAM via internal "investigation", almost a year later. He is still a student in good standing for now.
where are you getting unsubstanatiated?
dude, relax it there.
well for short(not really), its because she makes so much money off of her "black" image and community. Her direct audience are the people were affected by michael brown and eric garner.
"im at a disadvantage now"
it wont reach more people through another format though.
yep! it is a bit reassuring that she did apologize and i guess that is really all you can ask for
yeah, anna really did sound like a patronizing prick in her orig..... oh wait..... thats not who you meant.
i dont get it. how is admitting you are wrong suddenly being "stand up".
i wouldnt say apologizing for name is calling "big" of her but you know....
But for gawker, a highly viewed media/news outlet , to run away with the story and have such a hard stance on it. Not a great look.
"Journalistic high road"
oh im not doubting that this is a rare occurrence.
something something curt schilling
how the hell did you go from all the crap to "go to to be a good guy and be happy"?
he is what rob parker would call a cornball brother