slamadams--disqus
SlamAdams
slamadams--disqus

I hate Mark Millar's work. Often tone deaf satire that seems too easily mistaken for the thing it is satiring. However, I really dug Huck.

or even keep it. Its his money. Trump will be in the same boat when he's through. I just don't get the outrage about this.

yea, it never happens the other way.

On one hand, I see those VOD/Online cable packages being more competitive (and thus more affordable) and customer friendly. That also means that internet service will probably skyrocket since that service seems to be provided primarily by the landline cable providers and continue to be as competitive and customer

They seem to be doing what the comics are doing now instead of what they used to do. They are maturing along with their most trusted audience.

Can't say I am sad or surprised Powerless is getting the boot.

It seems weird he has not yet appeared on Arrow. Seems like an obvious softball decision.

There's no room on The CW/CW Seed for any of this?

Divergence or no divergence, it seems silly for Aida to program the Avengers into the simulation at all.

Yea I caught that too

Her losing the election, realizing that her VP choice might get it on a technicality, and that VP choice sincerely asking her to be his Veep is as finale a moment as this show could have.

But in pop culture, it is usually a period of least obscurity.

I'm not using peak to mean strength of their acting.

The bullets are CGI either way.

Not a runaway hit maybe, but relative to it having no hype (at least marketable hype, just word of mouth hype), no source material, no star power……

I was taken a back for minute thinking Miike had directed that hot beach girl version of Mortal Kombat movie.

Wasn't "bullet time" kind of a misnomer? Weren't The Matrix people referring to the row of cameras to catch one scene from multiple angles at a high frame rate, not literally slow motion bullets?

District 9

Inception? Or does Nolan's Batman clout not make it "out-of-nowhere" enough?

That seems to grant it more purpose than I was interpreting it. To me, I was thinking the inevitability of human folly, that given the chance we'll always create the thing that could kill us. That we created robots who stuck us in a virtual world to keep us sedate and in the virtual world we created robots again who