I always cringe when there's even a remotely religious article on Kotaku.

I didn't even come off HALF as dickish as your original comment to me.

That would be an incorrect usage of the word though. Not that I care though, they're the ones who used it incorrectly, and they are the ones who flipped off the handle. I won't be called rude because I know what a word means and they don't.

To Pawn:

The article is wrong. Do your own bloody research.

You don't even need to list the CF. You'll still fetch a pretty penny.

"Even if he was flat broke and decided to PAWN the ps3 it would be his choice."

"nobody ever asked for your financial advice in the first place"

Instead we get cover, and health regen like crazy.

I am still saddened that double and triple techs haven't been copied to high hell in all RPG's.

Right on, to get the best bang for your buck, such a psp will easily fetch $110.00+ on ebay.

Is it pro-B5?

You never said trade, you said PAWN. That's very different than selling.

What?

Because if you could ONLY afford 1 console, and ONLY afford 1 game, I can guarantee that there are a 100 better ways to spend your money. Food, utilities, rent, mortgage, child's savings account ect.

*whimpers in corner...

So while the PSN has been down, I've been playing Halo 3 for my multiplayer fix (don't like Reach at all) I haven't played it since Uncharted 2 came out, but prior to that I had something like 6000 matchmaking games.

I've been playing Killlzone 3. The campaign is really quite fun.

So then your entire comment about: "Not really, not everyone is as rich as you"

Its not about being rich. Gaming in an expensive hobby, if 200-300$ every five years will break the bank, one shouldn't be gaming at all.