What?

The hackers(s) never took down the network, Sony took down their network so it wouldn't be further exposed.

Why, because it invalidates your argument?

If you don't think that Microsoft and Nintendo have been silently bolstering their network, then your naivety knows no bounds.

Speaking of stupid fanboys.

"I would argue that, in fact, Sony's network was the most vulnerable to attack."

Sony didn't steal it though.

"Sony, in one way or another, DID know for 6 days and that's what they're reporting"

Someone should do Gawker's timeline from their hack.

And the second a person is missing the cops should announce that he is missing or killed?

Only because it was true.

So it wasn't the most likely culprit, it's some guy framing the most likely culprit?

They received more votes than every other party, and in more districts, winning more seats, hence the word "majority."

Did not Anon claim they were going to be hacking Sony just a couple of weeks before?

Taken, but how do you know they never deleted it shortly after?

lol, really? You know Anon?

I know they did, not sure when though.

HIGHLY doubtful, as they obviously suspected it was Anon, who would be more interested in screwing with Sony, than stealing people's data.

HAHA!

Data could be a million things.