Far more egregious than posting in the wrong comment section is forgetting about Edge of Tomorrow, a great movie and a great Tom Cruise movie.

He did an article once comparing the Wolf of Wall Street to the wolves in The Grey and well, I never made the mistake of clicking on his stuff again.

I think this is the Gizmodo solution, to the problem of the platform being slightly more useful than actual spam sites.

I tried reading this on mobile, but instead got directed to facebook-com-walmart-com.com three times (I know, fool me once and all). On the plus side, at least I won one (1) unclaimed reward!

The problem is that the people he interacts with often aren’t “defending abusers” - that’s just his first line of response any time someone disagrees (besides you, apparently). But once he’s painted them as “defending abusers” he can shield himself behind that for any criticism they make. That’s where the shades of…

Just once, I’d like to see a hitman movie where they are just like, doing their job as a hitman. Why does every single one have to revolve around the last job before retirment, or a job gone wrong, or a betrayal?

I don’t have any sort of issue with the OP, and you’re right that it’s a counterpoint to some of the other comments. The problem is that as soon as there is a reply that disagrees with him (?) in any way, he immediately shifts into trotting out the same logical fallacies and goalpost moving. You may want someone in…

Except that to recognitions, “being a dick” means taking a position that’s even one percent more nuanced that the most hardline stance possible, where she(?) immediately starts pulling the “I guess you’re just worked up about someone criticizing an abuser” card and shtick like that.

I would probably agree with your realistic take, but (as memory serves) there’s been years or at least individual ballots that have been the reverse.

There are any number of extremely bad positions to take on the HOF ballot that are less confusing than someone voting for either Clemens or Bonds, but not both.

COLLU2ION

Especially in a game where they were up 2-0 after just 11 minutes. That’s a pretty significant factor as to why United played the way they did, it’s not just a sidenote like it’s presented here.

I think the Hollywood-wide move towards grittiness is generally not great, and hopefully the next wave of Bond movies (at least after Craig moves on) swing back towards being more fun.

EoT and John Wick are probably my two favorite action movies of at least the last five years, and just happened to come out a few months apart. Too bad as I would have loved to see Tom cover EoT in depth.

Agreed on The Leftovers in particular, but while I did like the show better, I also thought the book works well as a companion piece to the show rather than just the source material. The show’s POV is obviously through the characters, while the book’s POV sort of comes from someone observing all of it and laughing at…

I thought QB’s who helped the 2016 49ers put together a 2-14 record were automatically the best choice for every single NFL team, regardless of need, fit, or long-term strategy.

What causes a person to leave a bag unattended at the airport? That’s like the one thing you aren’t supposed to do. Of course they were going to check it.

Yeah I mean I definitely wouldn’t expect it either. GMG’s whole ethos seems to be that because they generally fall on the “right” side of issues, they are untouchable on any of their shortcomings or hypocrisies. And writers like Burneko and Howard always struck me as kind of the epitome of that, people whose…

Thanks. Hopefully the commenters keep bringing this up until its addressed by GMG.

This is the second time I’ve seen this in a comment, but can’t find anything anywhere else on it. What happened here?