I think I just popped.

That is my strategy. I look at the 4 star reviews and the 2 star reviews. They usually have more thought in them and contain more useful information. And I doubt many fake reviewers are using anything but 1 and 5 stars.

And you know who could make a big difference in changing that situation? Ninja. If he stood up and told his fans that wasn’t acceptable some of them would listen. Instead, he just avoids the situation and allows the women to continue to have to deal with it because he doesn’t want to. And then he blames the issue…

You are correct, he can stream with whoever he wants. And we can criticize him for refusing to stream with women if we want. Imagine if this was a top actor saying he wouldn’t be in a movie with a person of color. Or a CEO saying they wouldn’t hire a woman to be a VP. That would be outrageous because it clearly is…

Anyone who thought this was something to be scandalized over has no business being around food prep. If you think Panera makes everything they sell there fresh every morning (or any other fast food restaurant for that matter), you are insane. There is a reason the food always tastes the same no matter what location…

Or. men more sexually objectify women. There are male streamers in loose fitting tank tops (see Knut for example), but not one says that is sexual. Women are sexualized no matter what they do on Twitch. For example, walking away from the camera to get something usually results in a million comments of “thicc”, and…

Did you really just compare a woman with cleavage playing video games to a camgirl stream? Do you also think stores need to police the women in them because they can’t operate like strip clubs because a woman might wear something tight? She is wearing clothing that fully covers everything that needs to be covered by…

Does she use Twitter in an official capacity? If so, there is good reason to not allow politicians to block people. For a good example, see Trump and his use of Twitter. He should not be allowed (and if I remember correctly, is not allowed) to block people because he uses his Twitter account to make official…

I totally agree with what you are saying, but I think you are misunderstanding who this is for. This is not for the working poor not making enough to pay their bills. Things like budgeting will not help them, so this will not help them. Well, let me rephrase that. Learning things like financial literacy will help them…

And this is why having police officers in schools is a terrible idea. Police know how to handle things ones way, via arresting people (well, 2 if you count just outright killing them as well). The police shouldn’t be involved unless an administrator feels they need to be involved.

I just can’t wait until someone comes and explains how the corporate world works and that these women were obviously just not performing as well as the men. Because that is the only explanation that could possibly make any sense. All of these are obviously inferior workers, but were not told this in reviews. The…

No, they removed his emote. He was not banned at all.

And you forget to mention the man intentionally puller his pants down and ran around showing his underwear while she leaned over to grab something off screen and you see the side of her underwear. If you’re going to be pedantic make sure you include everything.

Well first, Amouranth didn’t “flash” her vulva, as that implies it was on purpose. And outside of some really ridiculous conspiracy theories, there is no actual evidence it was intentional. Second, you apparently don’t get the idea that a cosplay would be ruined by mid-though length shorts. That would look ridiculous.…

His ban was only 14 days. He then didn’t come back for another 2 weeks, which shows how little he cared. The fact that he filmed in a public bathroom 3 times and only got a 2 week ban shows how much Twitch refuses to punish its top streamers. Hell, TFue dropped the n-word a couple weeks ago and got no ban at all.

As someone who lives here, this case really never should have been brought to trial. They couldn’t prove the baby was not stillborn, which pretty much blew their charges out of the water. They based most everything on her “confession”, which was her saying she burned the body. But after the medical examiner later…

The issue is that the system isn’t reformed. I would have no issue with him being released if the system released everyone based on those 2 questions. that is what the system should be. But the system as it is now is not based on those 2 questions. The fact he was “high achieving” was a consideration in his release…

I usually carry over the max number of days, but I make sure and use enough that I don’t lose any. I generally don’t take long vacations, so I don’t use them in batches of 5 like most people, but come August or so I will count up the days and start taking random days off to make sure I use enough that I don’t lose…

I would bet their idea is that the white woman didn’t “feel supported” because they didn’t back her up in her racist crap. The problem with their statement is that one side in this argument shouldn’t have felt supported. You don’t want the racist jackass to feel supported, you want them to know their shit is not…

The burning is getting more attention because they are claiming she admitted to the killing because she said she burned the baby. The fact she admitted burning the baby after hours of interrogation is seen as a sign she must have done it because she said she did it. But if the baby was not burned, it shows the…