simonstillwellgray
stillwellgray
simonstillwellgray

there's also the question of intention. if the winemaker didn't think the wine would be aerated, then it likely wasn't blended for it. while you might taste "more" there's no guarantee it'll be "better".

there's also the question of intention. if the winemaker didn't think the wine would be aerated, then it likely

i have one of these for whisky. i've used it... twice?

i have one of these for whisky. i've used it... twice?

possible answer: Homo sapiens were more promiscuous, neanderthals were less so, or vice versa. we interbred with neanderthals on the way to wiping them out. your preference probably mirrors your share of HS/N genes.

what's mechanical ham

aw thanks we love you too.

would be a lot lot lot easier if ipads supported nfc. then you could rub special playing cards on it to have them interact.

i don't love america either.

re the u's:

there's a joke in here... something about.. cuz your boobs get smaller as you drink the wine... sort of.. reverse beer goggling yourself...

there's no "fight". it's a comment thread. I haven't engaged with you because there's no point. please, continue to post degrading comments about me; you will be shouting them at my back.

i actually didn't inquire at all.

agreed.

or jezebel =/= feminism and vice versa.

neither have i. if you wash yourself, you don't get it.

i have no idea what you are talking about.

one would assume that in the comments section of an article on circumcision, that people's opinions on circumcision would naturally be a part of that.

i didn't mention feminists at all; i mentioned the name of this website.

surprisingly, a foreskin is not a turtleneck.

really? i think you'd find the number of people with a problem with circumcision would be reduced greatly if it was only available to adults who were able to give consent.