silver_star
silver_star
silver_star

Again, what about the other twelve? You haven't acknowledged them and the fact that they were willing to testify with no payoff, not a single dime. Oh right, that doesn't fit your narrative so you'll just ignore it. My nephew uses the same arguing tactics. He's five.

And another twelve were willing to go under oath in support of the ONE accuser who was still within the statute of limitations, even though they could gain nothing. Not a cent.

The one woman who's statute of limitations had run out brought him to trial, and another twelve women who stood to gain nothing were willing to tell their stories under oath, but he settled out of court before they could. They wanted to put their hands on that bible and swear under oath what he did to them, and he

I hope you're very young, say in your late teens/early twenties? There might be hope for you if you are, otherwise I despair.

You might want to read her explanation before saying she "shares the blame":

It's perfect, isn't it? I only heard it a few months ago and want kiss whoever came up with it, whether we look alike or not.

And mouths. Those are some lovely lips on both of them. Their noses are fairly identical as well. Other than the eyes I think we've got some doppelbangers going on here.

You're right. No one should ever listen to or enjoy art not created by those of our own race. Co-opting!

Maybe they thought their kids were reading the People magazines at the dentist? This Gawker article from February didn't gain much traction either, apparently.

I'm super surprised to read so many comments here saying this is the first they've heard of it, too! The news outlets that covered it in 2005-2006 (when he was taken to court and more victims kept coming forward) were places like People magazine, Newsweek and the Today Show, so I'm guessing the Olds saw it but the

It was a national news story as recently as 2006 when he faced one of the accusers in civil court, but even in that time I do believe things have changed a great deal.

He was first brought to court in 2005, which is when the story gained national traction. I googled and found coverage of the trials from back then in Newsweek, People magazine and the Today Show, which means that an older audience probably knew, but Millennials and Gen X-ers might have been getting their news

You're doing a great job proving it yourself in your comments on the matter.

I must have missed that story, and hearing your description am glad of it. Thank goodness for whoever did write the comment you're talking about. They do sound like a very good egg.

You are so incredibly sweet, and I know I've seen comments of yours that have warmed my heart, but I don't think I can take credit for that one unless it went back a while.(Looking back in my history and couldn't find anything recent, although maybe it was from when the most recent photos hit?) I'd love for it to

It's the same quality that Bettie Page had that made her so appealing and successful. Actual human emotions go a long way! Who knew?!

This deserves all the stars.

You are hilariously awful. That poor child might actually believe you!

"Or is this the one(and only) case where men should still be men?"

The better question might be: "How often do women pop the question?" You're making a mighty big assumption that it's always men who do. Look at it another way: I know plenty of couples where A.) it's a mutually arrived at decision between two adults B.) it's the woman who brings the topic of discussion up (which is