signorgiuseppe
Signor Giuseppe
signorgiuseppe

I actually really like the first volume, as well as the second and third. And while there’s definitely good stuff after that (especially the short stories with Robespierre and Norton), I think it gets sort of lost and never finds itself again. Better than a lot of stuff out there, but not quite as amazing overall as

)

Not exactly a compound, but just a different use of the word with, depending on the user, a different plural.

So it’s sort of a behind-the-scenes documentary of the amazing Thinking Fast and Thinking Slow?

I bought mine at a thrift store. What’s more, I walked in and they said “we’re closing in five minutes.” “We’ll be out in two,” said I. I walked straight to the shorts section, found a pair of seersuckers I’d wanted, walked straight to the footwear, found a bowling pair in my size, and got ’em both for <$10. Crowning

It fills me with such joy every time I see it, it definitely makes up for you. Altho, my confusion as to why they only employ it in cases where the two vowels are the same can prolly be put in the same category…

I think it’ supposed to be like samurai that way. Unless you’re one of those people who says “three samurais,” in which case I can’t help you.

It sounds like you think the prollem is me not getting the joke, which is I guess something I’ll just have to live with. It’s certainly possible…

Knowing how horrible it is, you’ll be fine. Will Smith and Margot Robbie are acting for a better movie. I think it would only be miserable if you were expecting possibly a good movie. I saw it in the cinema and don’t actually regret it, tho my brother-in-law bought my ticket.

Wait. I’m a huge Bowie fan, and Tilda Swinton is the celebrity La Signora resembles most. What dœs this say about me?

Or older sister, if they go with the Toby-as-main-character conceit.

I assume “reäction” (I considered, but rejected, “reäxion,” finding it de trop) was the one you approved of, which is great. I’m definitely tired of people telling me that the two vowels’ve to be orthographically identical to employ diäereses.

Neither Meyers or Colbert are running (completely) light-hearted late-night shows. Both of them have been relentless with the president on policy and conflicts of interest. And they’ve also attacked his hair, which obviöusly has no effect on his ability to do his job. (Similar to how conservatives loved to make fun of

Great! I wasn’t annoyed in the least at Obama doïng it, and it dœsn’t even register on my things-wrong-with-Trump-o-meter. It’s just that all the jokes are “Trump plays golf a lot,” which was also the joke about Obama. Apparently the two most golfing-est presidents have been Wilson and Eisenhower, and their legacies

Brad Pitt and co. already finished the job, tho, right?

This is actually an interesting question (to which the answer is no). In a compound, usually you do still have irregular plurals apply, thus
1) eyeteeth
2) eight reindeer
3) my grandchildren
But in those cases, the second element is also the head of the compound, mimicking an adjective-verb phrase. There are compounds

I remember beïng told that, but I also remember beïng told later on that “un grand homme” was “a great man,” but “un homme grand” was “a large man,” so now I don’t know what to think!

For that and Sin City, I’m not even sure “adaptation” is the right word. Can we call them videöbooks? Like, videöbook:comic book::audiöbook:novel?

I agree that that hypocrisy is ridiculous and a good moment for comedy, of the Jon Stewart “of course, the only thing that could taint this statement would be if we had videö of so-and-so criticizing this exact behavior from Obama, but to have that, we’d have to have an extensive backlog of recordings and and find the