Sorry, but when I scrolled up to check the byline, I was sure this was from one of the Newswire folks who are stunningly inadequate at political coverage. Shocked to see your name attached.

“I am sad for my friends—with many of whom I remain close”

It’s too bad you couldn’t fit more into the headline. Good god, do you have no style guide? Editors?

“Was forced”? Hopefully you are forced to use a dictionary before writing another headline.

The baby is like videos on formerly text heavy sites like the AV Club. It’s a naked attempt to add stakes (or money) that the audience is not interested in and wishes would go away.

What kind of managing editor for a sports site hyphenates major league? That is so embarrassing.

What the fuck is with the last sentence of this article? It’s nonsensical. What does that have to do at all with the story?

Where’s the Lockhart Steele article? I can’t seem to find it.

Joshua Alston was doing them. He’s pretty good, but always reviews shows late, even when a screener is available. Then he disappeared for a couple weeks, wrote a weeks-old review and mentioned being sick. Then there were no more reviews for another week or two. Instead of explaining any of this, they just kept…

Can we get a robot to write timely Nathan for You reviews? You’re only like three weeks behind on one of the greatest shows the medium has ever seen.

Wow, she created it a little over a month after winning an Emmy? And there’s already a trailer? Impressive, or English isn’t your strong suit.

I applaud the AV Club answering the question “Can we publish something less informed than our political takes?” But what a load of garbage.

Why do you assume it’s a man? Are all the leads there men? I find that hard to believe.

Charles Harder is also responsible for giving us Kinja. If he hadn’t sued GMG, Univision never would have bought it and the AV Club would still have an active community.

What a reductive, facile response. You seem to be a member of the same genius rhetorical group as Barsanti.

This is such a dumb take. I’m sure they’ve had treatments and attempts at getting such movies off the ground, it’s not like he can snap his fingers and a movie appears.

I refreshed the AV Club to see if they could finally manage to post the Nathan for You review from a couple weeks ago. Or this week’s. By the time it’s posted, it may even get 12 comments! (A post-Kinja record!)

To be fair, how is calling him Mr. Upton a joke? Like, at all?

So....he didn’t review last week’s....and last night’s is a no show, despite being under regular coverage. Is there any explanation forthcoming or has coverage been dropped? Any clarity would be appreciated.

“and citing numerous incidents where Twitter was far less quick to react when the behavior in question was targeted at women, rather than powerful men”