Wonder if we'll be able to tell that so much of the copy edit crew is gone…Their work isn't that apparent when they're on the job.

I came to comment that the end of that scene made me actually laugh out loud due to the way it went from inert to very bizarre in a flash. Didn't see it coming. Refuse to watch any other clips that may ruin the small joy this film has brought me.

Uh, they did, at the same time as Massachusetts. And btw, since all the pols hate the law in Mass., they already delayed implementation another six months, so I bet California gets it sooner.

I think that's exactly right. There's no way he writes this the same two years ago. And I get that critiquing certainly must consider the cultural context, but he's taking it to an insane degree and it's really tanking the quality of his interpretations.

This reviewer seems to be so afraid to agree with a character who is a Nazi on anything that he acts like when they do good, it must be because the writers forgot the character was a Nazi. It's so baffling and childish. He's ignoring or missing the single most compelling aspect of the show.

Or so they can make a trilogy without getting into a weird naming situation.

Apparently someone is unfamiliar with Charles Harder.

Trump has already said he wants to open up libel laws to sue legitimate journalists. If you'll remember, his man Thiel sued Gawker out of existence for publishing true stories (and I'm not talking Hogan, but the email and other stories). Thiel is closely monitoring Univision sites to try and shut them down. It's not a…

Yeah, Kenan had a different delivery with his opening line that seemed entirely unexpected. Pete broke a bit and the audience was laughing, so he took time to get himself together. It's so weird that worse has happened to Leslie Jones and the reviewer finds it charming, but in this case he mentions it multiple times…

"Jones has taken inordinate shit from a lot of people since she joined SNL, including being publicly demonized, basically for being a strong, grown-ass sexual being."

Apologies, glad you understood and agreed with the essence of my post.

I am not upset by the suggestion. I am baffled, from a critical viewpoint, how someone could come to that conclusion. I do not understand it.

Yes, the castaways on Survivor were able to be the only ones to predict the election, more than a year ago. How eerie!

You're not good with logic, are you? They may all be the shortest contestants too, but that doesn't mean there's a correlation.

Right. And we have massive problems with sexism, racism, and discrimination in general. Much work has to be done. But you make people weary and belittle the problem when you try to cram it in places it simple doesn't belong.
I think it should be called out when necessary. But it has absolutely nothing to do with the…

Wow, "you people"! You have no idea of my race, gender, or anything beyond one comment on the internet. I'd be offended if I were easily offended.

"Every week it seems like there’s a male target at the beginning of the episode that magically turns into a female target by the time the vote happens."

Eh, I think that's a really reductive criticism. People can joke about whatever. If it's funny should be the only measurement of quality.

You gotta get the scoop, or at least an explanation. Does the show suck because it's too constrained by the mothership/higher powers, or is this all what they actually wanted?

Yeah, that whole line of reasoning is weird. He basically is saying that since they haven't backed Clinton and are equating her at all with Trump, they can't be trusted.
Listen, I understand that Trump, in aggregate, is a billion times worse than Clinton. But many, many intelligent people think Clinton is one of the…