shortendofthestick
shortendofthestick
shortendofthestick

Rita?

Aneurysm in her sleep. A freak incident :\

FWIW, she died before birth and received an emergency c-section to save the child. It's amazing to me what medicine is capable of doing, and in this case, it was giving that father a few moments' time with his kid.

Fuck that book. My mom gave it to me as a child, and then disowned my siblings and me when she divorced my father. I fucking hate everything about that book now.

Amen. What the fuck is so hard about saying "hi, I would like to examine the topic of ethics in game journalism, and I don't support Gamergate in any way"? And then going on to talk about ethics in game journalism? Why are these fucks so unable to disavow support for Gamergate? Considering so many of them are "against

All I see are people trying to have a discussion about a small aspect of a huge event, and then being accused of caring about the wrong aspect, when in fact it's possible to care about two things at once. I know, you wouldn't expect our American ladybrains to be able to compute more than one thing at a time, but it's

For real. It's not even about the fact that his shirt's not business casual, or the fact that the landing was live-streamed and that people would be watching and that he would want to look good for his company. It's the fact that the current-event issue of "Women feeling unwelcome in STEM fields" is and has been a big

Bull fucking shit. Nobody on here is having a helpful conversation about what's going on. It's armchair psychology, ugly person jokes, jokes about how they're white trash, or gags about her name, or terrible rape and molestation jokes. Why the fuck does this site keep giving the human trash making 90% of these

Oh my fucking god, please stop covering this topic for the love of god you are making things a thousand times worse.

You're leaving out cultural influence. It's far more likely in a society like India's (and hell, like America's) that one man is having sex with a hundred women rather than one woman having sex with a hundred men. The latter would probably be punished heavily. The former would be cheered on. I probably don't get math

Eugenics issues aside, if population control is truly the issue here, they should start mass-sterilizing men instead, considering that a vasectomy is a safe, non-invasive procedure. But no, it's women who get the short end of the stick, now and forever.