No. The work instructions end with providing the torque for the lug nuts and list it as the final step of the process.

I would hazard a guess that every single manual that describes the job of tire rotation includes “properly torque lugnuts” as one of the last steps of the procedure.

Um no, tightening the wheels is the last step of a tire rotation, they did not "perform" the job they were paid to do

As employees they don’t. As contractors interfacing directly with the client to bring in money they should. They are essentially independent sales people, as well as service providers, using an app that doesn’t inform them of details about their sales. Lyft wants all of the control with none of the obligations. Lyft,…

Agreed... if Uber & Lyft considered its drivers employees. It does not. It does not pay benefits or lose compensation for hours clocked in but not profitable. They also do not pay for gas or maintenance on the cars, nor do they pay sick-leave or severance. So.. i’d argue this renders your anecdote moot.

The good old “pick yourself up by your bootstraps” argument. Free will is not a guarantee that you will attain the things you choose to pursue. As an occasional ride-share driver and full-time employee (at a job that calls me an employee), I too have free will to find a better paying job that will eliminate the need…

Can you really have oversteer if you never gain forward momentum?

OMFG... GOOGLE DIDN’T DO ITS DUE DILIGENCE. The entire industry hasn’t.

Which is unfortunately part of a larger historical pattern of objectification and manipulation of African-Americans based on... you guessed it... Skin color. Which is why the article was written. That context is kind of important, no?

Hello Oversteer, my old friend
I’ve come to talk with you again
Because a vision softly creeping
Of a HellKitty quickly fleeing
And the excrement that left a stain
Still remains
Within the sound of superchargers

Neat race car!

I will fight to the death to maintain your parchment and quill/iPhone rights and your gun rights today as they were in 1776!

“Yes Hong Kong would be different if they were armed”

“And, of course, this entire discussion ignores the point that you are demanding a license to exercise a Constitutional right...something we refuse to put up with in every other circumstance.”

Annexed, huh?  You mean Britain's deal with China expired and Hong Kong returned to China's rule as was always going to be the case, since Hong Kong is and technically always has been part of China? Just ruled by outsiders for awhile...

Awesome argument (seriously!). Change that to brown person muttering about crackers and see how many NRA types are suddenly all for background checks and licenses. Maybe that’s the way to sell it to them, make them think it hurts the brown man and boom, they will be all for it! 

I always laugh when these idiots think that somehow a couple of assault rifles or even an RPG could do anything against the federal government. The only reason why the Waco compound wasn’t completely obliterated was because it was in the US and not China. Had some shit like Waco or Ruby Ridge happened in China,…

Like how the Chinese soldiers protected their countrymen fighting for freedom at Tiananmen Square? Who do you think does most of the gunning down in these situations? It’s rarely foreigners it’s most likely their own countrymen like in east Germany, Russia, Cambodia, Syria, Uganda, Serbia, etc.

You must be real special if you believe that. China, and its’ billion of indoctrinated/nationalist population and largest world military would simply say “oh gee, you’ve got handguns and rifles? Well you can just have your independence then!”

It’s not an all or nothing proposition. You need a licenses to operate a car, why not be required to have a license to operate a firearm?