shoeboxjeddy
Shoeboxjeddy
shoeboxjeddy

Oh, yeah, Xbox did plenty of anti-competitive and anti-consumer bullshit during the 360 gen. Regulators should have stepped in back then too. Either they didn’t know or they didn’t care.

It’s extra laughable because Sony has spent millions making sure the Xbox and PC versions of CoD (and other multiplatform games) were inferior due to missing features and content included with the PS versions. Right now PS+ members get exclusives skins for CoD: Warzone.

This isn’t shilling for them, this is pointing out that Sony is pulling out a bunch of paranoid “But they could do this!” complaints instead of anything actually meaningful.  Sony is looking desperate because all of their complaints are being met by Microsoft willing to compromise.  Calling one company out on bullshit

Microsoft always charged for online and has been WAY more reliable than Sony’s offerings. Not only that they made a lot of the online free the last year (F2P games for instance)

There’s also the reality that if you have a modern tv you can actually play any microsoft 1st party title with your PS5 controller by using

No developer WANTS to release a bad version of their game...and Sony knows this.  Bad faith actions at every turn with this whole debacle.

Did Microsoft dump doom eternal on PS4 after buyng Bethesda? No, instead they released a PS5 upgrade for free and continued supporting it, including the Haptic triggers. Did Death Loop and Ghostwire Tokyo release in buggy/unfinished condition? No they released them to solid reviews. The fact is Microsoft already has a

I mean, Activision could also do this (or not release CoD on PS5 at all) in retaliation for the deal falling through, so. 

Sony is insufferable. They lead Xbox in marketshare 2:1 or better in almost every market except the US. Hell, it’s more than 95:5 in Japan. They’re just being pissy about a game that has already been guaranteed to be on their platform for more than a decade into the future. All this does is make them look weak,

harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Auror

Cool, now fix the algorithm so people don't have to put stupid clickbaity titles in order to show up in more feeds. 

Man, if only there was a way to tag videos as not for kids, who tend to be immature. Some way that clearly signals the intended audience to viewers. That way, advertisers could have some way of knowing who is watching a given video and what kind of ads would be appropriate to them.

If Goblins dont like being discriminated against, im sure there are suggestion boxes or proper forms to fill out to politely request equality from the wizards. Equality must be *asked* for, Politely and civilly, and be delivered on a timetable that is comfortable for the oppressor.

the fact that the story was designed in that way literally makes it worse though. depicting those who use violence against their oppression as ‘oh no actually they are extremists who want to oppress the rest of the people’ is like a very common way to essentially say ‘using violence to gain equality is a no-no’ in

An Auror was a wizard or witch that worked as a highly trained law enforcement official for a wizarding governing body.

The fact that nobody in-world seems to respond to the MC becoming a murderer with the killing curse just indicates to me that the wizarding world is already evil and corrupt, no matter how they see themselves. Pretty much everything I hear about the game makes it clear that world might have a thin veneer of seeming “go

Sounds like typical mealy mouthed liberalism tut tutting marginalized groups for not being courteous enough to deserve rights. 

Say what you will about the Shadow of Mordor games - and there are a lot of problems with them - but the first time you’re sneaking around somewhere and suddenly the camera smash-cuts to a scarred up orc covered with spikes calling you out like Hulk Hogan while his goons pour past him, it’s a hell of a moment. It

The Aurors are literally magical cops, there’s no two ways about that.

Yes, “liberal” in the actual definition of the term (rightwing supporter of capitalism), not the way the US often uses it.