shieldmaidenlath
Shieldmaiden
shieldmaidenlath

Right, so then answer my question. Before GG, did you defend Anita like you are now defending the freedom of speech of GG? I know, I know, you say you are NOT associated with GG, but you ARE defending them. So, before GG, when Anita was being harassed relentlessly going back to her first video, did you defend her

See, this freedom of speech thing works both ways. Are you pissed off for how you are being treated? Like I told another person, welcome to being a woman in gaming. Do you think people are trying to silence the opinions of you and your group? Welcome to being a woman in gaming. Do you feel people are threatening you

That's just a lie.

Here's an honest question. Is this really how you want to spend your energy? I mean, in the big scheme of things, you must realize the gaming industry has its corrupters the same as any other industry.

I like you, Sqarr ;> I think we would get along just fine.

Now you know what it feels like to be a woman in gaming.

Yeah, we get it. She didn't act like a "proper young lady", therefore, she must be punished. Dudes can do whatever they want, that's fine. But when women act in a way in which you or some other man doesn't approve, they get what's coming to them. End that with shrugging your shoulders and saying "I'm just sayin'".

Maybe Rick sees this as an opportunity to help reshape the new society. You know, kill off the psychopaths and cannibals before they can flourish and poison others.

Yeah, me too. I usually play a video game or read a book, tho.

There's a difference between "messy" and uninhabitable. And besides, what does cooking/feeding yourself have to do with messy or not? It doesn't. You have to eat several meals a day. And women still do the majority of cooking. So what, are you saying that's a burden women put on themselves? What's the alternative,

"even going to so far as to suggest the league set up a private legal system."

Where are you getting your interpretation from? This article claims nothing of the sort. It only talks about where the female population is higher, not that the female population is in power. Also, it says there's more male-on-male violence, not female-on-male or female-on -female violence when there's more women in a

Ok, I thought Kathy Bates' accent was supposed to be from Minnesota. It was the way she said home. I guess we'll find out eventually.

You keep spouting off those numbers but you are incorrect. Please supply ONE resource for that number because I have countered your posts with the tables and explanations.

Nope, wrong. That's not how these statistics work. They are based on registered voters, not actual votes. First of all, not everyone who is a registered voter actually came out to vote which is why these are based on Party Identification and Leaning. Second of all, some people DO vote independent. And if you look at

That doesn't line up with the tables. Look at Table 2: Party Identification Among White Registered Voters. It says for 2012:

Wait a minute, how are white WOMEN the reason these losers are in charge of the country when the majority of GOP voters are white MEN (52%)?

Over 40's in the hizzy!! Woot woot!

Are you implying they are a little formulaic? lol