I am very certain he wouldn't have received the ban if this had happened in a vacuum.
I am very certain he wouldn't have received the ban if this had happened in a vacuum.
No, I mean, it was a long history of that and much worse. It wasn't, as many are claiming, he harassed one chick and got a perma-ban.
No it isn't.
"Let's get together and talk about how Hitler didn't go far enough and the coming race war must do better."
STOP INFRINGING ON SUM GUI'S FREE SPEECH FIRST AMENDMENT
That's not what got him banned.
They do suspend ISIS accounts when they're reported.
This is him saying trolls should be. And I quite agree.
I'm happy to send you some of the things Twitter has declined to ban people for and you can decide if you're okay with them.
"It’s clear that existing hate speech laws are inadequate for the social media era….So perhaps what’s needed now is a bolder form of censure after all, because the internet is not a universal human right. If people cannot be trusted to treat one another with respect, dignity and consideration, perhaps they deserve to…
Legal protections don't extend to Twitter regardless.
He sicced his hundreds of thousands of followers on people (women), doxxing, threatening swatting, tweeting revenge porn, tweeting graphic rape and murder threats. For years.
Actually, no, people saying I should be gassed and tweeting about how Hitler didn't go far enough and kill the k*kes and and lynch the n*****s don't have a right to use twitter.
Or the Nazis. The fucking Nazis. Using Twitter to organize meetups.
Great. I have a whole list of actual Nazis they've told me aren't breaking the rules.
I both own and still listen to the Down With Love soundtrack. No shame. Good call.
I'm not sure we know.
It's going to think about it very intensely!
Canada is very offended.
Thanks! I'm not sure I read that—I will now.