Jesus, no wonder most Gawker Media writers just write shallow clickbait (with the exception of Deadspin). When someone puts time, effort, thought, and extensive background knowledge into a piece, people complain and tell them they’re pretentious.

Can we begin to put some meaning back into the word genius by not using it to describe a decent musician?

I count calories and you don’t have to be rude about it. Maybe you don’t need to worry about calories, but I’m short and I get fat very quickly if I’m just eating random handfuls of food and hoping I burn off the excess. BTW a handful of nuts has an insane amount of calories. I eat raw almonds and nut butters but I…

Don’t you know that if you’re not using a Diva Cup, you’re basically denying the Holocaust and taking a dump on a baby panda’s head simultaneously?

Nude with the flag

So standing on the American flag is wrong but placing it between your crotch is the epitome of respect. Got it.

She was honoring the flag by clothing her nude form in it. She was showing she literally wears her love of America. /s

Being called on her shit? Consequences? People looking at things not her?

‘she’ll be leading a protest on Friday, driving around Valdosta State in a continuous loop “as I’m ‘banned’ from campus.” She’s attracting both supporters and trolls, many of whom are posting the photo of her posing apparently nude with the flag.’

I know that obvious question is obvious, but using the flag in a protest to preserve human dignity is offensive to this woman, but using it as a prop in her nude photos is totes cool?

Throughout it all, several of the assembled black students point out that she’s resisting arrest and speculate what would’ve happened to them if they’d done the same.

1. Seems it did raise red flags which was why she was investigating his facebook page. It’s not impossible she suspected something before but didn’t have the evidence she needed. She may have even talked her self (perhaps with his assistance) into thinking she was being paranoid or overly jealous.

Yeah, that’s really the only type of logic to be found here. Conservative men don’t see women as equal to them, and conservative women are gullible and/or so selfish that as long as they aren’t directly affected by a policy issue they DGAF.

you're forgetting the part where 'well she went out on 2 dates with him 4 years before and had a drink 3 weeks earlier, so CLEARLY she was asking for it anyway, that slut. the father is a much better role model'

The logic is that rape doesn’t exist. There’s no custody issue if the father of the child did nothing wrong. And we all know rape is just this thing whiny women made up because misandry.

Well, we all know how lucrative it is for those sneaky, lying vagina-havers to cry rape, right? So what's to keep them from crying rape to keep a poor, innocent papa from seeing his baby?

But we know all women lie about rape - cause the female body has ways of shutting that down.

So let’s just get this straight... many states (and many republicans) don’t want to let women who get pregnant from rape have abortions, BUT they are ok with letting that child live with an abusive and dangerous person.

Ok so... we can’t have abortions, we can’t miscarry, we have to give birth, adoptees have to jump through hoops, but... our rapist can get us pregnant and then take partial custody?

No, the joke is that this is what idiot men who grab women's breasts think the boobies are saying. It is about men. Sanctimony works better when your premise isn't a misreading of the content.