Why don’t you ask the people who had their democratic government overthrown and replaced by a dictator how they feel? Or the people tortured or assassinated.

It means the documents are real and the unsupported assertion that he has an agenda is likely being used to distract from the content of the releases. He might have an agenda but that’s conjecture.

lol ok

Try and separate your hated of Assange from the authentic files wikileaks releases.

Lots of people believe they are knowingly working for Russia.

Nah. Lots of Democrats literally think they knowingly work for Russia. But yeah I like to have evidence before I assert things are true. Maybe you could try it one day instead of believing crazy elaborate conspiracy theories. Do you also think 9/11 was an inside job?

You would rather war crimes and corruption be kept secret? Would you change your tune if wikileaks released material damaging to Trump?

Trump is a Russian spy! Assange is a Russian spy! Jill Stein is a Russian spy! Now fucking Pam Anderson is a Russian spy! You’re ridiculous.

You sound like an idiot.

Haha. Run away once your unbacked assertions are called out.

I have. What’s your point? That’s not proof the files are fake or that Assange works for Russia. I believe their problem was with the way wikileaks did not redact information. Try again.

If it’s so easy to prove then perhaps you could... actually do it.

No amount of evidence? You have presented literally zero evidence.

You have no evidence

You mean wikileaks was a noble endeavor until it released information about your favorite political party?

Thanks. That was totally my point! lol

How did I defend his “rapiness”? Your problem is that you assume he’s a rapist without any evidence.

ok so you agree with me.

You accused me of being uninformed rather than engage in debate.

Yeah sure. It’s just don’t see how accusations about assange’s personal life discredits the work of wikileaks.