The rare “star-both-sides-of-the-argument”

And you still have no proof. Sad!

Yeah, I’M the one with factual weakness. Lol

And still, not a single shred of corroborating evidence. Go on, live blissfully unaware.

But it worked, so how is it a 3/10?

You fell for it, what does that make you

I don’t know about blind loyalty, because I’m in no uncertain terms not a Trump supporter. Just because I choose not to embarrass myself by propagating a completely unsubstantiated report with truckloads of red flags apparently makes me a rabid Trump supporter, and that is the problem with you type of radical…

The backlash you’ve gotten for such a benign and reasonable comment is really, really sad. The 9 replies so far all boil down to, “If you don’t believe and actively propagate this [dubiously supported, to say the embarrassingly absolute least] report, you’re a fucking idiot treasonous trumptard.”

Provide one single shred of ‘verification’ of the report and I will eat my dick for breakfast. Shouldn’t be a problem for you since there is apparently ‘shittons’.

Show me one, just one, piece of evidence that says any of those bodies you listed actually believes the report. And no, Buzzfeed and Gawker don’t count as ‘news services’ here.

Probably because there is not a single shred of evidence to substantiate even one word of anything in the report.

Chandler parsons is also much better than Derrick rose

-1

Wow no he did not. Yikes

yeah they’re just full of liberals crying, like every comment on this page, yours, the original comment, and this entire article.

Love this as a BC senior

Clinton L

Wow... you think very highly of Kyle Korver!

Just for the sake of argument... What would you say is the tweet he’s tweeted that has caused the most damage during his 1.5 years running for the election, or since being elected?

not really. if you run for president you have quite a bit of narcissism inherently