shameonyouforsayingthat
ShameOnYouForSayingThat
shameonyouforsayingthat

You seem pretty dense. You could be BUILDING these things (or at least claim to, like I said and you failed to grasp, people say lots of shit on the internet to suggest they are an authority on something and thus immune from criticism), and your claims will remain anecdotal evidence, which isn’t proof.

No...antiabortionists kind of revel in that kind of imagry.

The endgame was taking the chemical weapons off the table. Mission accomplished without a shot fired. This is just the postseason exhibition game where there’s no stakes, only pride, on the line. For America, I mean. The Syrians...well...they’re dying by the thousands and fleeing by the millions.

1) Too bad, because it is an anecdote.

Anecdotes do not make a fallacy valid.

First half of your question is valid, but my interest in sharing sources nosedived the moment you threw the genetic fallacy at me. I’m not wasting my time wrestling with Kinja just to have it handwaved by the intellectually lazy.

Lol. You haven’t been paying attention have you? Something like 80% of CAS missions are flown by Eagles/Falcons, and when the A-10 does fly CAS it’s required to stay above 10,000ft because it’s a sitting duck for MANPADS, where its sensors are far inferior. The fast jets are altitude-unrestricted because they’re

No, I’m saying the F-15/16 already HAVE replaced the A-10.

Farming is not rock and roll. It is the definition of country.

Yes. Farming.

1) It’s MANPADS, not “man pads”. It’s an acronym.

They already have that: the A-10s original mission profile is obsolete. It was designed in an era before effective MANPADS. It is not survivable when they are present.

In a word? Strawman.

Ironic does not mean what you appear to think it means.

F-22 and F-35 have APUs, as do most earlier US aircraft.

You’re a bad person.

Did you really just use “Obummer” without a shred of irony?

$100 plans are for people on AT&T or Verizon, who are better if you spend a lot of time traveling in rural areas. Everyone else is markedly cheaper. I,personally, pay $60 a month, but I use 10-20GBs of data per month because I hate dealing with free wifi (and am slightly paranoid about how secure those access points

I could promise to build you a Rome in a day, but that doesn’t mean I can.

Umm...those numbers aren’t remotely correct. I think you’re trying to compare procurement cost of the F-22 program to total lifetime cost of the F-35 program. Apples and oranges, guy. You don’t even factor in how there will be 10x the number of F-35s as there will be F-22s.