sgt-jmack
Sgt Jmack
sgt-jmack

Who says a truck is necessarily going to be beaten on?  Just because I have a work truck doesn't mean I have to beat on it. There are a lot of work trucks that still look clean after several years, even decades of use. If you take care of your gear, your gear will take care of you. My work boots are well over 2 years

A few things don’t sit well with me about this truck. Not to mention ok n that the guy in the video is annoying and full of B.S. there were thousands of extended cab truck sold back in the day. Four door Fords were also all over the place, as well as some Dodge four door trucks. In fact, GM made a few as well,

Typical B.S. from Hyundai. This is nothing more than a marketing scam on their part, like a lot of other claims they make, especially their 10 year 100k mile warranty that they fund ridiculous things in order to refuse coverage or repairs.

That is what Toyota uses theirs for. And they don't make ridiculous claims like Hyundai likes doing.

11k on a 1 ton is wasting a lot of money and torque. The 250 maxes out at 15k lbs. Save money and get what y otto u actually need. 

But it is wrapped up in Nissagggggnnn.

Llet’s not forget that a of these bigger trucks will be equipped with lower gears to assist in towing and pulling, so we really don’t need huge amounts of HP and Torqu, unless you want the damned engine to pop out of the hood as soon as you press the accelerator to the floor. Believe me back in the day, even with 200 h

So were thry the first ones to rock the monochromatic scheme?

It was a lot of the need for steel and other metals, and in turn also kept the home front morale and interest in the war high.

Neutral: I definitely care where my vehicles are manufactured, or at least their final assembly. There is a huge difference in the final product when cars are assembled in the U.S., Japan and Germany, heck even Britain. The other locations don’t seem to care about how the fit and finish is well, fit and finished. They

The “cough”, Blazer is way too expensive to begin with. Cars that are produced in low wage countries should reflect that.

Do ome research and you’ll find out how the engine and transmission are situated in the car, and that you would need to route the cables and linkage around to the rear of the engine. So a small amount of upset customers won't mean anything to Chevrolet. They'll tell them to actually drive the car before complaining.

Not necessarily, especially since less are sold.

Or physics and engineering.

You'd have to pay a lot more than that.  How do you expect the linkage and cables to reach around to the back of the engine?

Wy do you need ancient technology in a vehicle with advanced technology? That’s like putting Windows 2000 in a computer built today. Doesn’t make sense to anyone that knows what is going on.

490 hp in a car that light and all of the weight over the rear axle will surprise the heck out of you. Look at some of the stats on other sports cars with this sort of set up and you'll be surprised.  Power to weight ratio is key here.

You are one of the lucky ones. Most have a lot of issues, mainly transmission related.

Correct.  Their low reliability killed them, along with lower performance numbers compared to other cars of the time costing a few dollars less.

They didn’t want to sell it because of the major concerns about countless problems with the vehicle.