Dont forget the camp that just doesn't want to.

Not to start a flame anything but the ear-buds that came with the Galaxy Nexus were pretty on point. they weren't like OMG I"m selling my Bose headphones good, but they had rubber ends (like you should) fit well (like you should) and didn't sound like Utter shit (like you...well shouldn't I guess). I'm inclined to…

Whatever they do, make it an open platform with comparable drivers, so the webos-internalz community can port open webOS to it, if they do that and the phone is decent, I'll buy one.

Its a network thing, because LTE phones use separate networks (AT&T uses GSM & LTE, Verizon and Sprint use CDMA & LTE) voice and data are run separately. using it on 3G however I think is a phone thing, but I'm not sure.

with LTE you can talk and surf with Verizon too.

phones that have wireless charging can also be charged in the traditional way. I loved my touchstone for my Pre2 and its honestly one of the features about the 920 that has caused me to consider it for my next phone.

obviously more than they showed, but honestly; probably less than you might think, people in general, apple fans or not; are kinds dumb.

I personally liked the one where they were hold their phone, and the "iPhone 5" and couldn't tell they were the same phone

that may be true, but I would think we should get more innovation than no innovation. Apple didn't announce anything in yesterdays event that you cant already get in an Android phone or a Windows Phone 7 phone. they made it bigger and added LTE...yawn been done before. wheres the wow factor?

I have the same arrangement with my job; 8-4 with no lunch, I love it and wouldn't give it up even for a slightly longer lunch.

Cant give what you don't have

they can have it, they would only get 50 some bucks a month

Provided your phone is new enough that is; and even if you do get the latest update you might not be getting all the shiny new features. I mean you might get one; but not both of them.

In that case, Now Samsung can sue Amazon for infringing on their design to make up for some of the money lost in the Apple case.

I would have to agree.

Because if you don’t know what an iPod Touch is called, you might as well throw your law degree out the window?

Yeah I read this, seems pretty pejorative to me, just like Apple customers; doing just what apple tells them without reading anything first.

I agree, it’s not the products so much that I don’t like, they may be old and slightly stale, but they are solid. It’s the tactics of the company that turn me off, it’s that reason why I'll never give my money to apple again. Innovation through litigation is not the way to win over knew customers; and definitely…

" and Jobs& Company had a desire, dare I say - a mission - to eliminate confusion for the masses of stupid people in the world, ignoring of course those whom are already their customers"

Agreed, if I'm reading this right, it says the jury didn't even answer all the questions; it looks like they gave a blanket judgment based on the first phone they looked at. This needs to be thrown out.