I did scan it - i’m involved in the industry - and am very aware of the economics of NG in areas where new generation from coal is more expensive due to over the line transmission costs versus pipe in the ground - the “spark gap” as it is known in the industry. already operating western coal plants are far less…

Working well eh? the EU is an economic backwater of stagnant growth and enormous debt loads. Unemployment for those under 30 in Spain is over 25% for example. It is going off a cliff. The UK will be able to avoid much of the harm if it does leave, just as it has missed significant harm already by not being a part of…

Coal is being terminated by the obama EPA: http://www.forbes.com/sites/christop…

This editorial does an excellent job of making the case for Brexit

The idea is flawed - you can’t have sovereign nations sharing a currency and running up their own debt for example. The “project” is going off a cliff all by itself - the UK is jumping out the passenger door before it does.

no doubt the bureaucrats will attempt a crackdown. But if the UK votes to leave denmark is apparently likely to leave as well and the germans - though they hold the upper hand in many ways in the EU will feel even more isolated as the weathier - more fiscally responsible northern countries exit leaving them to…

The EU is a rigged - not free - market. Regs are written in depth to prevent new competition. It is amazing how massive this regulation is. That's cronyism.

They are negotiated by supranational - undemocratic organizations. The EU from its very beginning was a protectionist racket.

Read this:

The financial crisis in ‘08 was a big pushback against the elites.

Brexit would help the cause for democracy and true free markets around the globe. The EU is in collapse regardless so it only speeds up the inevitable.

Again you fail to see that you have no rational rebuttal for my argument. You are a crony. A beneficiary of preferential laws based on nothing but political muscle. You seem proud of your corruption.

A couple of reasons:

Exactly the same stuff as a car. If that means the end of bikes, so be it.

No, cars are by far the safest way to travel per mile of any terrestrial means. Outlawing walking along roads without a sidewalk does make some sense and is in fact the case on many highways.

brilliant comeback !!

Banning bikes entirely would save many many more. Ridiculous that bikes are exempt from safety regs that cars aren't.

Good for him and his customers.

Exactly - the EPA is out on the same plane of power and discretion - almost - as the Supreme Court which is intended to be one of the three wings of government. It is given far too much leeway to write rules as a result and has become a bloated interfering bureaucracy. That is not what the power of agency creating for…

Meanwhile you are polluting at a rate that literally could be several hundred to a thousand times higher than a 2016. The hypocrisy is breathtaking.