Which one?

It would genuinely be pretty amazing if Diesel played two different roles in the MCU and still only ever got to say "I am Groot" onscreen. Just three (well, four) words across two roles must be some sort of record.

I dunno. Nowadays I appreciate that they're very much "Guillermo del Toro's Hellboy". They're an interesting sideline to the real deal, and that's fine.

Indeed.

Pretty funny.

Yup, both are video games, and both star Craig, Dench and Rory Kinnear as Bill Tanner. Goldeneye (the 2010 game) is a remake of the 90s game, but reworks the plot to fit into the Craig reboot continuity. Pretty great all-round, does indeed feature Craig-Bond vs Trevelyan. Blood Stone's not quite as good, but it's…

Yes.

Goldeneye and Blood Stone (great and alright, respectively) fit neatly in there, and both have Craig and Dench on board, so I'd consider them the next best thing.

Charles Bronson made Bond movies? The 90s were a strange time.

If you needed a corpse, though, you couldn't use the corpse. A corpse doesn't look like a corpse on film. Usually you just tape a bunch of chickens together.

I"m fairly sure there's only about five of us that are regulars on here, so this might be the literal truth.

My dream New Gods has always been a probably unlikely Morrison/Simonson collaboration. Maybe with Walt writing his own backup stories in the manner of Kirby's old Tales of Asgard.

I don't think he's ever appeared beyond the joke to establish why Regular-Sized Rudy is called Regular-Sized Rudy.

Camp is subversive, though. One of the basic attributes of camp is the ironic positioning of low art or kitsch as sophistication or at least utterly serious. That is to say, you're right, but the subversive element is part of being camp, not separate to it.

Well, before Burton, Gotham in the comics (the 70s/80s Denny O'Neil era, anyway) looked pretty much "realistic" like Chicago or St Louis. Then they dedicated a whole storyline to turning it into the Furst/Burton version.

It'd have to be thirty-five. Other than that, if it was a very old, American-born dog, is there any specific rule that would disqualify it? (I'm not an American, so maybe there's another rule I haven't thought of.)

The Star Wars tie-in pages also do this wonderful thing where they only cite information that actually came with the toy, so Darth Vader is "presumably related to Luke Skywalker in some way" and can turn into a Death Star.

We should probably make them defuse, rather than diffuse, them. Just spreading them over a wider area of Denmark would be send the wrong message altogether.

No joke, I would love to see that line used in a Batman story. It actually totally works.

I can't speak for anyone else's non-American culture, but I started reading Claremont's X-Men at fifteen, and was delighted to discover the existence of Banshee, stereotypes an' all (a castle full of leprechauns, really?), because Chris Claremont was good at actually making the X-Men feel like real people under all…