seraphxiii
Seraph_X3
seraphxiii

I don’t think you and I are disagreeing, just coming from different sides of the issue. I totally hear you on the appreciation front, and I guess my anecdotes didn’t clarify as much as I had hoped.

I kind of get her frustration, though. I grew up with a combination of white and Asian cultures (Japanese adoptive grandmother and half-Korean mother) within a family that loves food and cooking, and I was totally that kid who was considered weird in the 90s for having Japanese curry, furikake and rice, sushi, kimchi,

Ah, so the “A” now stands for “Appropriation." Got it.

Between this and being replaced on Rogue One, Desplat doesn't really have great luck with Disney, it seems.

I love “Scream 4,” if only because it’s a fun commentary on the state of horror at the time of its release, what with remakes and reboots and torture porn. Much better than 3.

It was before an Ice Age movie before Fox being owned by Disney was nothing more than a Simpsons joke itself, so it's not like The Simpsons is only now being corporately synergistic.

The experimental Pixar Spark Shorts and Forky Asks a Question shorts on Disney+ might be what you're looking for. Then again, that's basically them moving the shorts from the films to promote their service, but they're not bad considering the shorts have always been a means of experimenting. One of the shorts even had

I don’t think there would be a boycott until it got closer to release or after release.

It’s totally possible the show is actually pushing the envelope when it comes to acceptable content, but at the same time, it’s kinda mildly shocking what stayed on The Simpsons while still being on Disney+. The movie itself has full frontal, underage nudity - not in a sexual context, but most definitely drawing

There are some great food and cooking channels on YouTube, though. And I can’t help but find emmymadeinjapan to be a complete delight. You just gotta sift through all the shit.

Side characters are one thing that can probably skirt by, but can you imagine the negative headlines that they’d get for putting a gay youth focused program more directly under the Disney name? “They’re trying to force their agendas down our kids throats!” “Disney’s kids content streaming platform encourages them to

The only catch is that Olyphant is 51, abouto 6 years older than even Ioan Gruffudd currently is and about 3 years younger than Robert Downey, Jr. currently. He can certainly currently play him NOW, but I’m sure Marvel would want to get a few movies out of the characters over the long haul, and would they want to

I’ve always pictured Timothy Olyphant, though I'm pretty much saying this as someone who doesn't read comics and only follows the peripheral stuff...

I think "The Lighthouse" was definitely robbed for cinematography. Zellweger was also my top choice for actress until I saw "Marriage Story," but her win doesn't feel like robbing Johansson.

I feel like it was a really weak year for mainstream films - I really enjoyed both Frozen 2 and Toy Story 4, but neither was truly great, and How to Train Your Dragon 3 left me seriously cold after the two fantastic first entries - so I really don’t know who I would’ve picked, but I guess I’m appreciative it was this

To be fair, it mostly got reshuffled because of the Disney purchase of Fox and the subsequent reshuffling of all their films and not necessarily because of its quality.

To be somewhat fair, they probably had a general (mediocre) sketch about the quality of Hallmark Channel movies that they later shoehorned a joke referencing the commercial controversy into at the last minute. So, actually, they probably should've done even better because they probably had much more time to brainstorm

Sure, but the movie itself is another story...

Was Liam Neeson actually not available for this?