seraphxiii
Seraph_X3
seraphxiii

I once spent a day in an argument with a friend who was insistent that we should all hate Disney's version of "The Little Mermaid" because it encouraged girls to modify their bodies for the benefit of men. I pointed out that this was likely an unintended misreading, at worst, and asked her to consider whether a

I was late in seeing the video and so many people were referring to her as the nanny I stupidly thought that was accurate until others got fed up and pointed out the racist assumptions and the inaccuracy. Then I also realized how shitty that was to just accept it without evidence (… actual, non-speculative evidence).

So… no mask… but she's a taxidermied corpse?

Stark's into himself, but I think his saving grace is that he's aware of it and also cares pretty deeply about those close to him, too. He's not always the best at showing it is all.

I haven't thought this through enough (I'm on lunch break), but I think you're on to something. I understand the need to divulge verdicts, but the circus around these things sometimes can lead to problems.

I hope to not lump myself into the people you're talking about, but as a victim of multiple sexual abuses and someone who later told people and wasn't really believed, even I kind of want people to consider just how powerful that kind of accusation can be. There HAVE been cases of false accusations, and it is

As a gay man, I honestly cannot care much about whether the actor playing the character is or is not of the same sexual orientation or even gender, as long as the actor does justice to the role itself.

Back in my late teens/early 20s, just when I was still on the brink of not knowing how to handle my secret-at-the-time attractions while holding on to my own Christianity, I ended up with a gay coworker who I otherwise liked, but he would do things like not going a day without talking about all the kinky sex he was

To a certain extent, however, those are movies that also target LGBT audiences and the people who support them. To those not aware, however, or even to the young kids questioning and not having enough support, the stereotype of flaming, flamboyant, and outrageous when you don't want to be those things becomes how they

Reality. Guess which one lacks it! I think you'll be pleasantly surprised….

He's damn pretty, but man, between him and curly-haired Chris Pratt as Star-Lord, I'm going with the goofball (who was still cute when he was chubby, btw).

I seem to recall people telling him that it didn't make up for it because he automatically went and used a forbidden word at a paparazzo because that guy was being an asshole.

Ah, so this is going to be like that one musical number in The Brave Little Toaster?

Ketchup and yellow mustard on a plain hotdog is fine and delicious to me, but there's something seriously off about mixing a fancy mustard and/or sausage with ketchup on anything.

I dunno. I must be opposite of you. I hated the movie and everyone in it BUT Courtney. He came off as competent and having more range than goofy Arnold and amotional Clarke. "Enjoy" may still be too strong a word, though.

Proctologist

I very well could be, and, like I said, I'm terribly behind on the show with not much motivation to fix it. (It's not boring, I've just got different priorities.)

I actually find him fairly interesting looking. It's subtle, but stuff like how his jaw isn't square but rather… angled rhombus? No way are his looks an issue for me. The man's a beautiful, not boring person to look at for me. Problem is, he gave me a terrible impression early on in my viewing of him in stuff like A

Jai Courtney somehow managed to not suck, I think, despite being completely miscast as Kyle Reese.

Meh. Possibly worse than Clarke, I'd say. I've not seen much of either in stuff, but both strike me as lacking in talent. At least Clarke can be adorably incompetent, whereas Delevingne comes off as just bored and above it all and therefore doesn't care to do much. Clarke was horrendous in "Terminator," and while you