I’m about 180 pages into Thomas Pynchon’s “Mason & Dixon” and am loving it. Judging by the length, I’ll wrap up sometime in 2018.

“And also Rudy is there!”

Man those kids are gonna have a rough go of it.

Yea I think that Peckinpah’s misogyny was well-established.

The guy who remains friends with Mike Tyson has sexual predation issues? Shock!

We can see how you love playing the victim.

That was the first role I recognized him in. He was great. This hurts.

You need to develop a thicker skin if you’re going to show up regularly on these forums.

I guess when you talk to yourself exclusively, you have to invent strawman argument like this when another person chimes in.

You written so many words, but using the debunked “Hillary campaign started birtherism” narrative pulls away all credibility.

Daarreeellll.....DARREllllll....

Again: assuming that the disgusting extremism of those candidates would repel the all-important moderates/swing voters is not an unsound strategy when looking at how similar extremists fared in 2012. That they thought higher of Americans’ characters is not a dent on them - it’s on us.

“When you make false accusations all you do is undermine your credibilit.”

When they went to his wedding he wasn’t serious about running for office. This is a stretched argument where the Clintons would have to be psychic to meet your standard.

Some enterprising journalist probably smells a Pulitzer in this mess.

Yeah the Prince is off on some epic “both sides” fallacy kick. Making a lot of assumptions in his posts.

When you imply Clinton started the birther stuff, you lose credibility.

Yeah, I totally get having your appetite to rewatch that movie (and it’s a great one) being tempered by the knowledge that one would have to rewatch that sequence.

You may want to watch it again. Just throwing it out there.

At what point did they “schmooze” during the campaign? Your narrative falls apart there.