“If an attack happens in an area where we perceive violence to be common, we don’t really process it with the same interest as when it happens in what we assume to be a “safe” area”

Please, stop with the bullshit. Enough with, “they are culturally closer to us” or “it’s natural to blah, blah”. Your just making cover for racism. It’s racism. To many white Americans, white Europeans lives matter more than others, probably even more than the lives of their fellow non-white Americans. And I say BS,…

That’s a dumb comparison. Belgium and France are foreign nations that most Americans have no relation to. How do attacks there affect me, an American, more than an attack in Tunisia?

And you’re ignoring/ excusing racism because you’re a coward.

And by “I”, you mean all Americans? How many Americans have lived in France or been to Belgium? Why is it “We are all France” but never “We are all Turkey?”?

So the business model distorts news.

So basically white lives matter more. You could have just said that rather than dancing around that truth.

As far as i’m concerned we can’t have enough of Kimmy K!

Authoritarians do want the people whom they blame for their “troubles” to be punished and suffer. They want Big Daddy to put the foot down on those brown usurpers, hard!

It’s resentment, primarily racial resentment. They see their place in the hierarchy slipping away and they want it back! The election of Obama just made this more salient for them. “Make America Great Again” means put those usurping minorities and women back in their place.

I’m sorry, I don’t think anyone marries either of these men if you aren’t horrible yourself. You only marry these two if your uber ambitious or covetous of wealth no matter the cost.

They probably aren’t that much different from their husbands. I mean, who marries either one of those butt hairs except if they are disgustingly ambitious themselves.

They shouldn’t be fantasizing about sexing up animals, slaves and rape victims either but those are all common fantasies.

And many wouldn’t consider the whole dominatrix thing “normal” either. The whole setup of that fantasy is someone has complete control over another. All these fantasies involve the violation of consent in some fashion.

First, we are taking about fantasies.(So someone fantasizing about their adult partner being a teen or child) Someone who is attracted to the idea of their partner being a slave, or raping their partner is fucked up, and fucked up in the same way that fantasizing about children is fucked up because all involve…

Don’t worry, they get to pay it out in installments spread out over 115 years.

Is it any more skeevy than rape fantasies or master/slave fantasies? Really?

Why? How are we to judge which fantasies are “appropriate” and which are not?

“Okay guys, feel free to act out your pedophilic fantasies crime-free”

“bunch of oiled up, well muscled men wearing nothing but gold lamé briefs chatting them up as they walked in, and “encouraging them to dance”