And yet I've never seen O'Reilly question a major Congressman about the "temptations" their colleagues face on the Hill and how they manage it. I mean, they are more likely to work at place that condones rampant adultery, drugs and dick pics. Probably all that goddamn rap music.

Exactly what BigSexy said. His entire line of questioning was based on the faulty premise that a) "these" kids are from "bad" homes b) "these" kids are unruly because of hip-hip c) "these" kids are more susceptible to drugs and violence. He asks questions based on pre-made conclusions that the coach easily corrects…

Actually, they do lower it if you buy the phone right out. And it's not an option on some carriers, it's the only option. Even carriers that give you an option, you're still paying for the phone through your contract, it's just simple loss distribution. Carriers aren't selling phones at a loss anymore.

Uhhh, no, you'd actually be wrong. Even on contract, you're paying full price for the phone. It's just split up over the course of your contract. They're not giving shit away for $300 less than MSRP.

Right, because sending a dick email = caring about education. It has nothing to do with not wanting to do his job.

Except he missed the two other people standing next to her. Sounds like a pretty poor job if this was actually his intent.

I would argue the mini-protest by the 1500 runners adds more credibility to this version of events.

This is probably the main reason. Look at how law school tuition doubled in the last twenty years as applications and enrollment spiked. More demand? Milk the cow.

This is seriously the best point. College isn't for everyone, but in the way our society has headed, some form of higher education is necessary because most students out of high school haven't learned anything to prepare them for the workforce.

According to Cali's Labor Code, yes, it is required.

Can't speak about the Ravens, but you're spot on with the Jags having a similar logo in the beginning before the threat of a lawsuit by Ford. I was hoping for a bit more creativity there.

I know I'm late, but that seriously just made my day.

Despite the interesting language...I couldn't have said it better myself. This is Deadspin, why are people expecting the WSJ?

The entire article was about the Seahawks being so dominant at every position on D last night that it was difficult to pick out a true MVP. Soooo, what's the problem?

Lots of unnecessary anger here for people discussing how great Richard Sherman is...

I might disagree with you, but I respect your right to disagree with me. Hell, at least you had the balls to come back, give some context, and apologize. That probably happens only a few good times a year around here.

I mean, it's really just the same argument brought up in every sport once the MVP is announced. Should it go to the best player in the league or should it go to the player who added the most value? Sometimes, it's the same person, but there's always going to be at least one voter who decides the best player in the…

They don't anger me in anyway, I just disagree with them. Personally, I just have a problem with a billion-dollar industry mistreating some of its more visible employees. Cheerleaders obviously don't affect the game itself, but it still leaves me feeling uncomfortable for odd things like having to buy/sell the…

They are entitled to complain, we're entitled to care or not care as much as we want. Everyone gets to be entitled.

I agree with you. The decision to break confidentiality or requests for there to be no investigation is closely-guarded and only made in very extreme situations. As far as I know, it's only done when there are other potential victims.