scrunchiepower3
scrunchiepower3
scrunchiepower3

Oh, I think she’s aware. I found out she existed by waking up in the middle of the night and hearing him on the phone with her, crying and promising he wasn’t lying about where he’d been that evening. Then they had an argument about when I’d be moving out of our house, in which he lied and said I’d promised to leave

All of that makes sense to me. I blocked both of them on social media ages ago, and I’m considering moving back to my hometown for a lot of reasons (closer to parents, lower cost of living, housing market less scary).

Do whatever you want with those dumb sheets and remember always that the moral high ground here belongs to you.

This isn’t something that Jezebel is likely to cover, but there’s a front-page story in the New York Times yesterday about a prominent pediatric endocrinologist who sexually abused dozens — and probably hundreds — of child patients during the period of nearly 30 years when he operated a “growth clinic” at the

Witchy nails!

His offices are kept on lock-down, to stop him ever having to see the people he’s trampling in the dirt.

There were lines crossed here, but the principle that high-ranking members of the Trump administration should be confronted in public spaces by the people to whom they are accountable isn’t debatable. McConnell, along with the others, are creating and enforcing legislation that harms real people in remarkably direct

This is by far the most common and short sighted argument that I see. Wringing hands worried about what the “other side” will think or do.

I get that this adds to their “mob” narrative, which isn’t helpful. But, I know the rage I have in my own heart for those assholes, so I can understand how when someone has a chance to scream in this motherfucker’s face, they take it. I’ve never had the misfortune of crossing paths with any of the Republican elite, but

I am so confused... “Hailey Bieber is soon to be wed”?  Then wouldn’t she still be Hailey Baldwin?  And aren’t they actually already married?   Is it just me?  Do I need more coffee?

Nice bangs Bella Hadid! Not everyone has the face for them, but her long face shape makes them super flattering.  She should keep them, it makes her face look less alien/severe.

And the terrible streaky highlights. 

#Accurate. I had a Rachel back in...oh...1998? Not as much of a shag as the Ultimate Rachel, but basically the same cut. I have naturally wavy hair that held the style really well at the time, so I could get 4 days from a blowout. But omg, that blowout...what a fucking pain in the ass. Now I have a pixie and couldn’t

with the piecey volume! so bad!!

Also, I thought a true “Rachel” included the various colored caramel and blond highlights, which, besides the blowdrying and ironing, has the additional maintenance of having to color or highlight your hair at least every month.

Yeah, none of the celebs pictured in the article actually have the Rachel. And the picture the article links to as their example of the Rachel is from season 3 of Friends, which is long after Aniston got rid of the Rachel haircut (which was only in season 1 because she hated it). That’s’s just shoulder length hair

Agreed, of all of the looks she had during the run of the show that was the least flattering. I even like the cut from the pilot episode better.

Yeah, none of those cuts featured in the article are actually The Rachel. And you’re right, the actual Rachel haircut was a layered nightmare that is too high maintenance for anyone who doesn’t keep a full-time hairstylist on retainer.

Rachel had a few different looks over the life of Friends, with the length differing dramatically but I assume we’re talking pure “Rachel” here?