not to be a douche, but now that literally anything people do can be considered as "culture", this question always strikes me as sort of intractable. by contemporary definitions, where does anyone get off acting like they have ownership of "culture"?

i left what i thought was a pretty salient comment on an article here at the av club, but i've yet to receive a response

there was a silent film about bluebeard, if that counts as a "serial killer". do you just mean real life serial killers?

anyone still laughing about this event should not be allowed to vote

not just ANY good, ALL good, best movie of the previous millennium, no question

forest < trees

sometimes i miss my old hobbies, but then i don't

i bet that took a longass time

finally

tolkein's academic contributions are significant but the typical layperson doesn't care about them so if the layperson reads a book such as this now and then then it doesn't matter really all that much with respects to his legacy except to people who actually don't care that much anyway

yeah well i like borges and that sort of stuff, so the silmarillion was a-okay with me

is this the guy from the sprite commercials?

or that's roughly 9 metal-rap fusion bands

finally saw GET OUT. it was not as scary as i hoped, but alright i guess. basically a feature length r rated outer limits episode.

andorra only has like 90k people, so 51 per million is how many bands?

tf how come

was there no undercover this week?

very wryly xamine yr zipper

did u ever think that u might be more happy if u made different decisions? but then what if u only make the decisions u make because u are already unhappy? sort of like the experience job job experience dilemma. u simply must find a way.

beer is okay i guess