What's wrong with 'we just didn't want to'? I mean, do we now have to include female characters for the sake of having to include female characters?
What's wrong with 'we just didn't want to'? I mean, do we now have to include female characters for the sake of having to include female characters?
Instant fucking preorder.
SO tell me again how this is any different/worse than women wearing next to nothing in 'slutwalks', femen's topless protests, and nudity in women's art, all three of which are praised on gawker media?
>> And that comment about getting with women who aren't smart for a booty call... ew. No.<<
I said it before, I'll say it again. Welcome to the U.S, where you can maim and mutilate people without anyone batting an eye, but show some skin, and people lose their shit.
Besides, women shoot down women all the time for being too short/not being rich/living with their parents/not having a nice car, so us men are allowed to have standards too.
I don't see what's so wrong with it. At least he made himself clear. Women shoot down men all the time for things like size, skin color, bank account, etc, so it's cool for men to have standards too.
Here is the thing though, he doesn't have his own publisher and wants to maintain control over his own ip.
Here is a whole list of why I still got mine:
It actually was. It kinda felt like one of those gangsta movies (Scarface, Shottas, Jerusalema), but as a fantasy. It goes into the politics and background of the world of Dragon Age. If DAO was about the world, DAII was about the politics and culture of that world. ALmost like a fantasy version of The Wire.
Yeah, FFVII is a real omission. Regardless of how people feel about it, it was a turning point for gaming in general.
On the flipside, how do we know she isn't an evil bastard? Like another poster said, this isn't about their marriage, it's about custody and visitation rights.
And even if Kotaku was calling on youtube to restrict such comments, or youtube was restricting them, it's still not a violation of the first amendment because they are both privately owned entities and the racists and homophobes can still go elsewhere to post what they want.
Actually buddy, free speech just means you can say what you want and (long as you aren't threatening anyone, harassing anyone, plagiarizer anyone, slandering someone, or inciting violence) not be sued and arrested for it. It does not exempt you from the consequences of what you said.
So as a man, if I'm walking down the street and someone is saying things to me I don't like, is it cool if I shoot them?
She should team up with this guy.
Anyone who buys this game is automatically a pervert, MRA, and a secret serial rapist! Heck, you are wrong for even KNOWING about this game! DERF!
broken leg/broken ankle? Figured it was close enough.
Greg Jennings! He put da team on his back doe!