It's not about "1080p60"- it's about shaders and particles. It's about DirectX 10 and DirectX11. it's about tessellation and draw distance and Ambient Occlusion and FXAA and MSAA. These are all things the consoles are missing.

Re: the laptop GPU: Yeah, that's true, but you claimed it wasn't a gaming PC, which it clearly was.

...said no one, ever.

Try playing any modern game on a PC and you'll see.

Quoth the full retard: "Laptops are not gaming machines."

This is true, if not longer. And I am a PC Master Race dude, who only plays PC now due to the much, much, much better quality. However, you are correct- the new console hardware hits, and the PCs play catch up for a while, before the parabola curves again and they are coasting past the consoles in both graphical…

No they're not.

This is just flat out wrong information. As a PC Master Race member, and gamer in general, I have to correct people when I see this bullshit posted.

This is just wrong. Please go crawl into a hole. It's stupid, stupid, stupid, and wrong. It's such an asinine, old argument.

Am I the only one who didn't mind young Jeff Bridges? I've seen plenty of CGI movies, from the Pixar fare to Final Fantasy, to regular movies that feature a lot of CGI, and this one didn't seem bad to me. The 3D was headache-inducing, and the story made fuck-all sense, but the visuals were awesome IMHO.

Haha, someone on Reddit posted in a Far Cry 3 thread that he was "AR about his AA" and he had it literally maxed out on 2 GT680s. The game looked gorgeous w/o AA, but when you saw the max MSAA on w/ the other AA tech that the game has, it was like almost looking at something real. The immersion-breaking aliasing on…

Actually, I'd see giant robots effective vs. nukes in the scenario that at least there's not the radiation issue in the effected area. Like in the scene where it's walking through town- yeah, you're gonna lose a few buildings, but you'd lose a lot more w/ nukes anyway. Then. the nukes have the issue of making the…

I fail to see how guided missiles, cruise missiles, special bunker buster bombs (designed to penetrate dozens of meters of solid rock and concrete and should therefore have little to no issue penetrating even a thick skull), cluster bombs, thermite bombs, etc. would not stop this thing, but some simple machine gun…

Ooh, good response. Hadn't considered that angle.

Yep, that was my first issue! I was like, wait, missiles have a range of 20-30 miles. Even assuming they ran out of missiles, it's far more likely that we'd have Nighthawks and Predators on the way for bombing runs and remote strikes, thousands of feet above the heads of these monsters.

ITT: PS3 owners feeling buyers remorse over purchasing a console on the promise of future games that turned to vaporware. LOL

**edit** Gawker commenting system broken- sent my reply to the wrong person.

This is exactly why I returned my PS3 for another 360, but I plan on getting a PS3 next year when The Last of Us ships. That game alone is a system seller for me, plus I'll have the benefit of a lower console price, and all the classic games, like God of War and the Uncharted series will be cheap too.

"Many moons ago..."

Sounds like my play through of Black and White 2, where I let my creature do whatever it wanted, and it developed a penchant for snacking on villagers, pooing on their houses, and running headlong into battle against overwhelming enemy forces. Good times.