scientistah
scientistah
scientistah

You can rationalize and justify your bullshit with whatever sleazy excuse-acrobatics you want, but it won't change the fact that you're a fuckstain who makes jokes in the middle of a discussion about rape. "But this is about sports!" Oh? You're still a fuckstain with a shitty/non-existent sense of humor. You were

You definitely do not believe the same thing about rape and rape-culture as all the well-adjusted normal people trying to carefully explain to you what a fuck-wit you are. You see, they recognize that your joke was never funny. They don't see this as a topic to make jokes about. They recognize that your joke was

Awwwww.... Nobody got your completely un-funny joke.... It must be so hard on you to be so incredibly unique and clever in a sea of people who all think you're a fucklord. How about you just keep being a whiny little cry-baby to every single person here, and next time people will get your cute little joke. Sounds

Please stop apologizing for a rapist Doug, or making excuses. And what exactly is it that this rapist didn't have any choice in? Was he forced to rape this woman?

Here is some remedial reading for you and everyone who likes your humor, since you have NO IDEA whatever could be problematic with your comment equating a violent anal rape to "a mistake to grow from":

Why wouldn't you read about the case before defending it as not a rape?

You should have taken your comment to reddit at r/mensrights because commenters here know better. How many rape cases have you ever heard of with open and shut evidence? This is about as surefire as it gets. DNA evidence on her clothes (lending credence to her memory of being jerked off on while puking (which is

Based on the Seattle Sounders, you seem like you might be under the misapprehension that false rape reports are common. They are not. This is not a justification to assume that all allegations are true, but when a woman is black-out drunk and vomiting and DNA evidence shows that anal intercourse took place, the idea

rape apologist

This isn't a guy who stole something from a department store or was busted with marijuana.. This is a man that took complete advantage of another human being (a physically weaker person, a woman).. Anally raped her and masterbated all over her (Her hair, anus and all over her clothes).. Do you really think this type

But redemption (at least from the Christian point of view which concocted the whole idea in the first place) requires repentance, which means that he (and only he) must confess his sins, and not just to a priest, but to the one he trespassed against (or publicly) and bearing out whatever punishment is deemed necessary

Rape-apologist trolls are among the worst trolls.

If she wakes up not remembering anything but puking, that's called rape. Also, this:

Because legally (and I would say morally and ethically) if she is too drunk to remember and/or passed out and he had sex with her, that's rape. Consent does not just mean lack of being able to say no.

"She wakes up remembering only the puking part, but somehow she just "knows" that the sex wasn't consensual?"

It should go without saying that if someone is too intoxicated to remember an event, they're also too intoxicated to consent.

Try re-reading this article, and then read the linked articles before you start asking admittedly stupid questions. It's all there. Why should anyone else do your homework for you?

white people dislike intelligent outspoken black men more than actual criminals? i'm fucking shocked.

"Pardon my apparently stupid question"

Just stop typing if you're going to begin with that.

The idea that someone like Richard Sherman becomes a national villain for being rude to other players and guys who have ACTUALLY COMMITTED SERIOUS CRIMES WITH VICTIMS become redemption stories is so goddamn ridiculous.