?? I'm agreeing with you and you have good points, so I'm replying to promote/recommend. So I might be missing if we are disagreeing (sorry I'm tired and losing my cognitive function) over something we actually agree on.

Olal, thank you for posting this response, I think it sums up really the different 'feels' of the different sites-articulates the manner of discussion on Jezebel vs. Kotaku vs. Gawker vs. io9.

I doubt that, I think I've pooped before 2007.

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=who+is+dead…

Yeah, my brother and I have been alternating on it and I think it is great for fans (which my brother and I are!), and a fun playthrough (maybe once or so), but the actual gameplay isn't spectacular. But we are having TONS of fun with it.

I for one am shocked and appalled I tell you! SHOCKED AND APPALLED.

Yeah, it would be great, we'd get a 100lb 5ft waif who kicks so ~~much ass~~

Also didn't psychology define being homosexual as some sort of mental deficiency until recently? Again, change does not necessary undermine 'science'.

Can you directly answer why a biological definition as a male/female vs. a psychology definition as male/female is so bothersome?

And I don't understand what you mean by science having no meaning, but you obviously aren't a scientist, so I'll let it slide. We change definitions all the time based on the facts and meanings we assign.

Yeah, but so is bacteria and a lot of other stuff. Calling it a life really has no meaning, unless you are begging the question by saying it is a human being. Then we can get on board with each other for a science debate. Until then, I think you and I should
go to our separate corners.

Did anyone else read Valextra as Valtrex(a)?

We've moved past white bro observational science into the era of DNA. So we aren't going off bird wing lengths or colors. Or if the parasite has a flagella or not.

This one time the PC police came to my house and told me my jokes were dumb and it hurt my feelings!!!1!!!!

A life?

How about a BUDDY BUDDY System for the dudes? That way one of them can hopefully stop the other one from being a jackass?

;) Ha, not sure if that's a bug or a feature. I'm honestly too old for this shit (Pacific Rim, etc. etc. but I can't help it. My head is easily turned by explosions).

Thank god. Now begone you old!

I would disagree and say that scientists would still do it. I can't speak for myself but I know a lot of the scientists I work with don't go into it for the money. There is the cash money bling bling scientists (pharma, for profit yadda yadda), but I think it isn't really from the side of the scientists.

You lie! There was no 3rd season!