I'll take that, as it's still four more than the fucks I give for you trying to be relevant either time :)

Yes. I meant the dialogue track and my apologies if that wasn't clear.

I meant the dialogue track and my apologies if that wasn't clear.

Oh my, you're so right. It's.. it's my fault - I should've known to read the title as something different to what the article actually turned out to be. And some day, someone is going to defy those evil trademarks which have for all time prevented anyone from doing anything remotely similar to what I've suggested…

If it'd been a newly drawn anime of Blade Runner, rather than cutting old bits together and using the original soundtrack on top, I'd be more impressed. This just feels like clickbait and I'd like that minute of my life back.

Even if you didn't say it outright, you did kinda heavily imply it or at the very least leave yourself open to accusations of such:

With a better control system, that game would've been huge. Unfortunately it was just an absolute pain in the ass to even try and play.

I'd suggest you take a look at this!

Without intending to be rude, it sounds like you're trying to make yourself sound cleverer than you are. That's not meant to be an insult, I'm just going off what you've written. I disagree that you've thought out all scenarios, and therefore you cannot rule conclusively; The potential situation, which I thought of…

Correlation does not equal causation. Church attendance is dropping. Does that mean going to church causes murder? Note that I'm not disagreeing with the conclusion, but you can't say it's such a simple explanation to get there.

True, but we don't know what proportion of those who do end up harming others may have been influenced by games. Now I personally don't think there's that effect, but it's pretty easy to see why anyone who doesn't know that much about games puts 1 and 1 together and gets 12. I had a few aggressive phases growing up…

There's a difference between you thinking something is true (particularly when it's because you want it to be) and it actually being proved scientifically. This is the latter. No offense but everything you wrote was purely anecdotal, but scientific fact is much harder to argue with.

Not directly, but I'm grateful for your political endorsement. You start the revolution there, and I'll kick it off here in the UK. We can meet in the middle (and then spread the campaign outwards).

Amen to that! Without meaning to sound like I believe in any sky wizards. I'm also of the opinion that if they have sex education in school (which they should) then there should also be relationship education. My campaign for education secretary starts here.

Ah.. the old "sorry about that but really I did everyone a favour, amirite?" approach, eh? ;)

I agree with your message, but dislike your delivery. No-one's perfect and everyone needs to feel needed. You included. You aren't better than anyone else.

Screenwriter Max Landis had an idea: put 40 people (some who knew each other, others total strangers) in a room, pair them up randomly and get them to slap each other in the face.

Actually, I put it to you that it's not a case of "The Kids Today" but "The Tools Made Available To The Kids Today" which simply enable the tendencies of being young.

I am not saying this to be snarky, but there are lots of mistakes in your writing (capitalisation, grammar) that makes it hard to read. Ultimately it makes the reader question how valid your opinions are and undermine what you're saying in the first place.