I got to 2:35. Did anyone beat that?

"snooty European.."

I don't even try to play the bad guy. It's just not fun for me. I like being the hero. Being evil is easy.

Said the guy who took my post 100% seriously.

Personally, I think it's vile.

I have been thinking long and hard about your ideas, and I have decided to accept them. I would like to give you the following reasons why I think your beliefs against being gay and gay marriage are sensible, logical and robust:

Utterly false. There are gay animals in nature. You know that, don't you? How do you explain that one? Don't you know that people don't decide to be gay, they can only decide to accept that they are? So their sexuality is natural, it is their nature, it is nature. As far as "traditional" sexual orientation goes,…

"I see no reason whatsoever to teach kids about homosexuality, bestiality, pedophilia or whatever."

Watching these two is like listening to two people talking next to you on the bus. I'm sure they're lovely people in real life, but it seems they're out of their depth. The age of the internet celebrity is a relatively immature one.

I do agree with you that it's highly derivative - everything except for the main 'character' absolutely screams Mario to me. I just don't see it in the bird.

The pipes, yes.

I did. Like no-one else.

Well, that just drives me crazy.

The extra difference to me seems to be that ghost writers in literary circles, for example, are typically used for figures who are not writers themselves, but need their story told. No-one would expect a politician or a famous actor to be the next Shakespeare, and I think it's reasonable to assume they don't sit in…

I don't quite get or agree with what you're saying, but as long as you enjoy movies then power to you! They're there to be enjoyed after all :)

I'm surprised to find myself agreeing with the simplistic portrayal of politics in Star Wars, but Syria is probably a pretty good example of why it's not just a case of the UN being able to nobly drop troops within five minutes of there being obvious human rights abuses.

I don't think it would be so bad if he'd admitted it from the start, but he lied about it. He claimed he'd written them himself, using moving and somewhat inspiring words, but he was lying. It might be understandable as I'm sure it's a terrible thing to go through, but it's still dishonest and that's rarely a good…

There's nothing I like better than economics lessons from people with potty mouths who are deliberately ignorant about major world economies.

You had it easy. My (ex-)girlfriend bought me ZOE for Christmas when it came out thinking that's what I really wanted. Because it was so popular, she could only get a used copy.

But unnecessary criticism is not automatically deconstruction, and I feel that these videos are increasingly the former rather than the latter.