Then I think you missed the point.

That must've taken so much effort to make - but really, was it remotely worth it?

"Yeah, Superman kills. Human beings kill, too."

I'm a member of several environmental groups and we have plenty of examples where our efforts, including petitioning, have helped turn the tide (possibly literally, in some cases). The ability to create numerous, pointless petitions does tend to lead people to assume they change nothing by default. They raise…

I thought that might happen, but it was all as relevant and important. However, here's what I most wanted to say that you can take away:

I don't think anyone appointed you to speak for Gaus and then you trash talk him anyway. Then you trash talk me for being 'illogical' even though you haven't cited logic anywhere in your response. And you also pass judgement on who's right or not, with your qualifications of.. what exactly? Who are you again?

Gaus'…

How you successfully try not to be Canabalt is come up with a new game from scratch. No-one accuses COD of copying Tetris. Instead, and if you know a better theory then let me know what it is, it seems like this game was developed from the following method:

Well, Mann did get two shots at it after LA Takedown :)

But coming out and saying that is when you show you understand the issue and want to make amends for it. Sony has done this, even if it's just a corporate front. Microsoft has yet to. That's my point, and answered your question: "how's that for humble pie?"

It's not an assumption, it's an interpretation based on the language you used (there's three fucks in there for a start). MS reversed their plans because it was losing them a ton of pre-orders and gaining them endlessly bad PR. I've not seen them say anywhere it was because they weren't putting the gamer first or…

Sony's main PR line for the past six months has very publicly been "Yes, we made some mistakes, we've learnt from them and we're putting the gamer first." If that's not eating humble pie, and if you have anything to suggest that what they're saying isn't true, I am keen for your reply.

Oh come on, at least put some effort in here - what kind of analogy is that?

I actually thought it was an incredibly well-written script, and I can count on my the number of times I've said that about games on my balls.

Did you have a point to make or are you testing out your quote mark button on a new keyboard?

I can't entirely understand what racism is like for an Asian but I can do my best using a human skill called empathy, and it's for that reason that I'm aware of how my actions (and choice of words) can affect other people that I consider them when I act and speak.

NORMAL people? Wow dude, wow.

"Overly sensitive"? As in, people who feel certain ways about things you don't agree with or understand?

If those movie trailers flashed "NOW GO AND WATCH ME," at the end, your argument might make sense. They don't. I wasn't hating on the guy, I'm saying he's sold himself short from an otherwise good video.

Of course artists need to eat, I never disputed that. My point is that movie trailers don't flash "NOW PAY $10 AND WATCH ME" at the end because it'd be cheap, treat the potential audience like cattle and undermine the artistic value of all involved. I'm suggesting this guy seemed better than that, and his…

"Your comment is stupid"? There's a scathing analysis that'll go down in the annals of academia. No, credits at the end of a movie give credit to the work of people involved - it's not the same as a sign which says "FOLLOW ME, I WANT YOUR LOVE*!" which flashing 'SUBSCRIBE' basically does.