schnide
schnide
schnide

Is that all it was? That's five minutes of my life I'll never get back.

A fragile, losable disc? What are you, some kind of absent-minded butterfingers?

Damn, that's a shame. How about if I be the one to make you check in to the internet every 24 hours and not let you own the games you buy, can I have your money instead?

Miyamoto's autobiography.. now there's a book waiting to happen.

He kinda reminds me of the leftovers from when they made Vince Vaughn.

Not sure I agree with you there.. or understand why you've reopened a two month old thread!

Hey no. 5 - tag, you're it!

I prefer this one.

Well thanks! I..

Is that sarcasm? I hope not. I personally much prefer seeing the backs and the obscured side views of mascots. Seeing the front is so mainstream, I mean, it's been done to death!

Oh man, this is going to OWN!

Right, we're going to split hairs are we?

I already said in the first post that the article gives numerous free advertising references to one particular company, and that goes against the principle of good journalism. While you may not understand that, it doesn't make it any less true.

They can use the word tablet, which covers everyone's purchase, not just those who pay through the nose, and doesn't give away free advertising, compromising the integrity of the author.

"Thank you for reading Kotaku, a news and opinion site about games and things serious gamers care about. We're here to inform you and, sometimes, entertain you."

I don't take anyone seriously who uses the word 'butthurt' seriously, mainly because you're probably 12 years old and don't understand the issue.

True or not, that's entirely irrelevant.

"If he likes the product then why wouldn't he advertise it?"

You mean like they don't mention the Galaxy S4 or HTC One when they review Android games? Would you want to remember some context or does that hurt your argument too much?

It was the way the game works with an iPad.