schererna
schererna
schererna

I have seen a couple reports when people have been laid off with the words “Only one months salary” and it kind of surprises me since that is sorta the norm with business.  Sometimes long term employees may get more and you may get you vacation days paid to you but expecting more then a month of severance at most

Everywhere you don’t wanna be. ;)

Now playing

The proper way to deal with beating the hull against the waves is to build a hydrofoil boat. Just pops out of the water and then keeps going, no more slamming into waves.

...where are these $250k waterfront properties? 

Not quite the same level of idiocy, but I’ll take a Gibbs Quadski

I went the other way, and put a canoe on two motor scooters.

1-4 - because all of those things visually indicate “fast off road man thing” to a certain slice of the population. It’s pure lizard brain, peg in hole marketing.

Which leads to 5 - “superior product” in this case is “expensive thing rookie wide receiver can blow his signing bonus on and pilot drunk into a florida

So many questions:

I mean, you don’t know and I don’t know what Bungie named their toolsets internally. 

The suit probably does specify, the reporting doesn’t (and that’s not Kotaku being shits, I doubt any reporting specifies). EDIT - It in fact does, yes.

I think the subjective measure of “good” is the problem. Blizzard color-codes cards by rarity, which generally (but not always) means they’re better cards. In a five card pack, you’re guaranteed to get at least one card of “rare” quality or better, and this is explicitly stated.

In addition to the rarity levels,

Also, it’d hardly be too much to ask for Blizzard to have to publish the odds of getting any given card in a pack. Plenty of other companies do similar things. It seems likely that would end the lawsuit, but Blizzard being Blizzard they’re likely unwilling to do that, because, shockingly, people would buy less packs

You’re operating on a huge assumption that doesn’t really make sense. That is that the kid effectively “stole” $300 from him. 80% of your post is about that.

If I understand correctly I don’t think the parent has a problem with the child spending $300 on games primarily, but rather with the worthlessness of what she acquired, because of deceptive nature of Blizzard advertising re: Hearthstone.

There should be dozens of folks trolling these idiots with ANTIFA chatter on the CB radio.

Very good at shooting strawmen it seems.

Very much this. And once some misinfo is out there it’s basically impossible to reach everyone who believed it with the correction. According to the video, he ended it early because of news sites picking up the tweets, which drastically amplifies the potential reach. Going from just the few hundred who spread the