I mean, you don’t know and I don’t know what Bungie named their toolsets internally. 

The suit probably does specify, the reporting doesn’t (and that’s not Kotaku being shits, I doubt any reporting specifies). EDIT - It in fact does, yes.

I think the subjective measure of “good” is the problem. Blizzard color-codes cards by rarity, which generally (but not always) means they’re better cards. In a five card pack, you’re guaranteed to get at least one card of “rare” quality or better, and this is explicitly stated.

In addition to the rarity levels,…

Also, it’d hardly be too much to ask for Blizzard to have to publish the odds of getting any given card in a pack. Plenty of other companies do similar things. It seems likely that would end the lawsuit, but Blizzard being Blizzard they’re likely unwilling to do that, because, shockingly, people would buy less packs…

You’re operating on a huge assumption that doesn’t really make sense. That is that the kid effectively “stole” $300 from him. 80% of your post is about that.

If I understand correctly I don’t think the parent has a problem with the child spending $300 on games primarily, but rather with the worthlessness of what she acquired, because of deceptive nature of Blizzard advertising re: Hearthstone.

There should be dozens of folks trolling these idiots with ANTIFA chatter on the CB radio.

Very good at shooting strawmen it seems.

Very much this. And once some misinfo is out there it’s basically impossible to reach everyone who believed it with the correction. According to the video, he ended it early because of news sites picking up the tweets, which drastically amplifies the potential reach. Going from just the few hundred who spread the…

How many recalls has Ford, or GM or anyone other than Tesla had because of dumb ass gimmick they actively included in the vehicle, such as the boombox, gameplay while driving, etc, as opposed to actual component failures or faults?

I know 2 guys named Wolf. They were both German. Also, Eddie Van Halen’s son is named Wolf. 

But the law itself does not say that’s an issue. It only has minimal sound volumes it requires at various bands. Does not specify it has to be a sound that is recognizable as a vehicle.

Wolf is a normal name in German. It’s usually short for Wolfgang, but there are plenty of kids just named Wolf (usually pronounced ‘Voolf’ but in America they’ll often use the Anglicized pronunciation). I know two.

Naming your child Wolf is 1000% better than naming them a misspelled version of a normal name, like Ashleigh or Madysyn or Megyn.

It would need to be a sound that a blind person would recognize as an approaching vehicle.  Your stereo and occasional fart sounds do not convey that at all.

Ford has had 7 recalls since January 1.

for things like cars catching fire, seatbelts not being properly attached, rolling away, fire again, rolling away again, driveshafts falling the fuck off.

but yeah, tesla’s speakers not being quite loud enough is a mortal fucking sin.

My understanding is they are saying the issue is the boombox noise is louder than the original PWS sound (both are coming out from the same speaker). But given the original law was that the PWS is intended to allow pedestrians to hear the car and also the law itself does not specify a specific sound, I’m not seeing…

Maybe I’m not understanding, but what exactly is the issue? Is it that the PWS coming out of the speakers is too loud? Or that the boombox drowns out the PWS? If the boombox is something that can play loud music to the outside world while the car is driving, then I would kindly like to stop my subscription to society…

Maybe. Maybe not.