The suit probably does specify, the reporting doesn’t (and that’s not Kotaku being shits, I doubt any reporting specifies). EDIT - It in fact does, yes.

I think the subjective measure of “good” is the problem. Blizzard color-codes cards by rarity, which generally (but not always) means they’re better cards. In a five card pack, you’re guaranteed to get at least one card of “rare” quality or better, and this is explicitly stated.

In addition to the rarity levels,…

Also, it’d hardly be too much to ask for Blizzard to have to publish the odds of getting any given card in a pack. Plenty of other companies do similar things. It seems likely that would end the lawsuit, but Blizzard being Blizzard they’re likely unwilling to do that, because, shockingly, people would buy less packs…

You’re operating on a huge assumption that doesn’t really make sense. That is that the kid effectively “stole” $300 from him. 80% of your post is about that.

If I understand correctly I don’t think the parent has a problem with the child spending $300 on games primarily, but rather with the worthlessness of what she acquired, because of deceptive nature of Blizzard advertising re: Hearthstone.

It’s ridiculous that something like losing subscribers just once can have such devastating effects. As if nonstop growth was possible or even sustainable.

Your stupid system is SO fucked that 7 million or 15 million votes ISN’T what makes the difference.

He really wants that kid to stop tweeting where his private jet goes.

There should be dozens of folks trolling these idiots with ANTIFA chatter on the CB radio.

Very good at shooting strawmen it seems.

Very much this. And once some misinfo is out there it’s basically impossible to reach everyone who believed it with the correction. According to the video, he ended it early because of news sites picking up the tweets, which drastically amplifies the potential reach. Going from just the few hundred who spread the…

I dont think it would need to be added to the database to differentiate her DNA from the assailants DNA. You take a blood sample from the victim at the time of collecting the rape kit. The DNA in the blood is used to identify the DNA that is the victims. The results from the rape kit processing would send the foreign…

There is a law, in the Constitution. It’s called the 4th Amendment. It’s been mentioned a few times.

The rape victim consented to an invasive procedure to obtain samples that can be analyzed to obtain a DNA profile of her assailant. She did not consent to having her own DNA profile sampled and entered into the police database to be used for whatever purpose the police decide to put it to. The rape victim is not…

How many recalls has Ford, or GM or anyone other than Tesla had because of dumb ass gimmick they actively included in the vehicle, such as the boombox, gameplay while driving, etc, as opposed to actual component failures or faults?

But the law itself does not say that’s an issue. It only has minimal sound volumes it requires at various bands. Does not specify it has to be a sound that is recognizable as a vehicle.

It would need to be a sound that a blind person would recognize as an approaching vehicle.  Your stereo and occasional fart sounds do not convey that at all.

Ford has had 7 recalls since January 1.

for things like cars catching fire, seatbelts not being properly attached, rolling away, fire again, rolling away again, driveshafts falling the fuck off.

but yeah, tesla’s speakers not being quite loud enough is a mortal fucking sin.